Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
406-01-002 ISMRM Abstract

Functional imaging of the cerebellum at 10.5T and 0.5 mm isotropic resolution

Primary: Brain Function and fMRI - fMRI Acquisition
Secondary: Brain Function and fMRI - fMRI Analysis
406-01-002 · fMRI: Acquisition and Preprocessing · Tuesday, 12 May, 8:20 AM–10:10 AM · Auditorium 2
Keywords: Cerebellum Ultra-high resolution Fmri Ultra-High Field (UHF)
Accepted
Lasse Knudsen 1, Yulia Y Lazarova1, Steen Moeller1, Nils Nothnagel1, Lonike Faes1, Kamil Ugurbil1, Essa Yacoub1, Luca Vizioli1
1Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
Presenting Author: Lasse Knudsen

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. 1. Van Essen, D.C., Donahue, C.J., and Glasser, M.F. (2018). Development and Evolution of Cerebral and Cerebellar Cortex. Brain. Behav. Evol. 91, 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1159/000489943. [doi]
2. 2. Manto, M., Bower, J.M., Conforto, A.B., Delgado-García, J.M., Da Guarda, S.N.F., Gerwig, M., Habas, C., Hagura, N., Ivry, R.B., Mariën, P., et al. (2012). Consensus Paper: Roles of the Cerebellum in Motor Control—The Diversity of Ideas on Cerebellar Involvement in Movement. The Cerebellum 11, 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-011-0331-9. [doi]
3. 3. Habas, C. (2021). Functional Connectivity of the Cognitive Cerebellum. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 15, 642225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.642225. [doi]
4. 4. Kim, S.-G., Uğurbil, K., and Strick, P.L. (1994). Activation of a Cerebellar Output Nucleus During Cognitive Processing. Science 265, 949–951. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8052851. [doi]
5. 5. Diedrichsen, J., Verstynen, T., Schlerf, J., and Wiestler, T. (2010). Advances in functional imaging of the human cerebellum. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 23, 382–387. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0b013e32833be837. [doi]
6. 6. Van Der Zwaag, W., Tse, D.H.Y., Poser, B.A., and Priovoulos, N. (2025). Cerebellar imaging for neuroscience at 9. 4 T. Magn. Reson. Med. 94, 2129–2139. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30596. [doi]
7. 7. Waks, M., Lagore, R.L., Auerbach, E., Grant, A., Sadeghi‐Tarakameh, A., DelaBarre, L., Jungst, S., Tavaf, N., Lattanzi, R., Giannakopoulos, I., et al. (2025). RF coil design strategies for improving SNR at the ultrahigh magnetic field of 10.5T. Magn. Reson. Med. 93, 873–888. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30315. [doi]
8. 8. Zhang, B., Radder, J., Giannakopoulos, I., Grant, A., Lagore, R., Waks, M., Tavaf, N., Van De Moortele, P., Adriany, G., Sadeghi‐Tarakameh, A., et al. (2024). Performance of receive head arrays versus ultimate intrinsic SNR at 7 T and 10.5 T. Magn. Reson. Med. 92, 1219–1231. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30108. [doi]
9. 9. Moeller, S., Pisharady, P.K., Ramanna, S., Lenglet, C., Wu, X., Dowdle, L., Yacoub, E., Uğurbil, K., and Akçakaya, M. (2021). NOise reduction with DIstribution Corrected (NORDIC) PCA in dMRI with complex-valued parameter-free locally low-rank processing. NeuroImage 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117539. [doi]
10. 10. Vizioli, L., Moeller, S., Dowdle, L., Akçakaya, M., De Martino, F., Yacoub, E., and Uğurbil, K. (2021). Lowering the thermal noise barrier in functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Nat. Commun. 12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25431-8. [doi]
11. 11. McGibney, G., Smith, M.R., Nichols, S.T., and Crawley, A. (1993). Quantitative evaluation of several partial fourier reconstruction algorithms used in mri. Magn. Reson. Med. 30, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910300109. [doi]
12. 12. Vizioli, L., Moeller, S., Dowdle, L., Grant, A., Sadeghi-Tarakameh, A., Eryaman, Y., Lagore R, R.L., Auerbach, E., Adriany, G., Knudsen, L., et al. (2024). Spanning spatial scales with functional imaging in the human brain; initial experiences at 10.5 Tesla. Preprint, https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.20.629800 https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.20.629800. [doi]
13. 13. Triantafyllou, C., Hoge, R.D., Krueger, G., Wiggins, C.J., Potthast, A., Wiggins, G.C., and Wald, L.L. (2005). Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters. NeuroImage 26, 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.007. [doi]
14. 14. Uğurbil, K. (2021). Ultrahigh field and ultrahigh resolution fMRI. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 18, 100288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2021.100288. [doi]
15. 15. Van Der Zwaag, W., Kusters, R., Magill, A., Gruetter, R., Martuzzi, R., Blanke, O., and Marques, J.P. (2013). Digit somatotopy in the human cerebellum: A 7T fMRI study. NeuroImage 67, 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.041. [doi]
16. 16. Priovoulos, N., Andersen, M., Dumoulin, S.O., Boer, V.O., and Van Der Zwaag, W. (2023). High-Resolution Motion-corrected 7.0-T MRI to Derive Morphologic Measures from the Human Cerebellum in Vivo. Radiology 307, e220989. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.220989. [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/406-01-002