Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
367-01-012 ISMRM Abstract

An accurately controlled compact pneumatic transducer for MR Elastography at 3 T and 7 T

Accepted
Lorenz Kiss 1, Stefan Wampl2, Marcos Wolf1, Jean-Lynce Gnanago1, Christopher Breitenfelder1, Andreas Hodul3, Quang Nguyen3, Markus Königshofer3, Roberta Frass-Kriegl1, Martin Meyerspeer1, Albrecht I Schmid1
1High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
2Department of Medicine III, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
3Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Presenting Author: Lorenz Kiss

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. R. Muthupillai, D. J. Lomas, P. J. Rossman, J. F. Greenleaf, A. Manduca, and R. L. Ehman, ‘Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves’, Science, vol. 269, no. 5232, pp. 1854–7, Sep. 1995, doi: 10.1126/science.7569924. [doi]
2. W.-C. Yeh, P.-C. Li, Y.-M. Jeng, H.-C. Hsu, P.-L. Kuo, M.-L. Li, P.-M. Yang, and P. H. Lee, ‘Elastic modulus measurements of human liver and correlation with pathology’, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 467–474, Apr. 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0301- 5629(02)00489-1. [doi]
3. J. H. Runge et al., ‘A novel magnetic resonance elastography transducer concept based on a rotational eccentric mass: preliminary experiences with the gravitational transducer’, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 64, no. 4, p. 045007, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1088/13616560/aaf9f8. [doi]
4. W. Neumann et al., ‘A novel 3D printed mechanical actuator using centrifugal force for magnetic resonance elastography: Initial results in an anthropomorphic prostate phantom’, PLOS ONE, vol. 13, no. 10, p. e0205442, 2018, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205442. [doi]
5. L. Kiss et al., ‘Design of a new MRE transducer - placed between tissue and coil’, presented at the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) 32nd Annual Meeting & Exhibition, 2024.
6. T. Meyer et al., ‘Comparison of inversion methods in MR elastography: An open‐access pipeline for processing multifrequency shear‐wave data and demonstration in a phantom, human kidneys, and brain’, Magnetic Resonance in Med, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1840–1850, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1002/mrm.29320. [doi]
7. S. K. Venkatesh and R. L. Ehman, ‘Magnetic resonance elastography of abdomen’, Abdom Imaging, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 745–759, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0315-6. [doi]
8. K. Eckstein et al., ‘Computationally Efficient Combination of Multi‐channel Phase Data From Multi‐echo Acquisitions (ASPIRE)’, Magnetic Resonance in Med, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 2996–3006, June 2018, doi: 10.1002/mrm.26963. [doi]
9. H. Knutsson, C.-F. Westin, and G. Granlund, ‘Local multiscale frequency and bandwidth estimation’, in Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing, Austin, TX, USA: IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, 1994, pp. 36–40. doi: 10.1109/ICIP.1994.413270. [doi]

Cite this abstract