Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
567-03-006 ISMRM Abstract

Imaging Protocol Validation for Global Collaboration

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Open source software, sequences, and reconstruction algorithms
Secondary: Analysis Methods - Software Tools
567-03-006 · Standardizing MRI Through Data Formats and Phantoms · Wednesday, 13 May, 1:40 PM–2:35 PM · Digital Posters Row H
Keywords: Validation Software Tools Open-source software Image Quality Assessment Open Science
Accepted
Ashley W Stewart 1,2, Steffen Bollmann, Franco Pestilli2
1School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
2Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States of America
Presenting Author: Ashley W Stewart

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. QSM Consensus Organization Committee. (2024). Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: A consensus of the ISMRM electro-magnetic tissue properties study group. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 91(5), 1834–1862. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30006; [doi]
2. Van Essen, D. C. (2013). The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview. NeuroImage, 80, 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041; [doi]
3. Casey, B. J. (2018). The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 32, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.001; [doi]
4. Bycroft, C. (2018). The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature, 562(7726), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0579-z; [doi]
5. Gorgolewski, K. J. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44; [doi]
6. Haas, A. (2017). Bringing the web up to speed with WebAssembly. Proceedings of the 38th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1145/3062341.3062363; [doi]
7. Pyodide/pyodide. (2024). [Python]. pyodide. https://github.com/pyodide/pyodide (Original work published 2018);
8. Jernigan, T. L., et al. (2016). The pediatric imaging, neurocognition, and genetics (PING) data repository. NeuroImage, 124, 1149–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.057; [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/567-03-006