Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
366-03-005
ISMRM Abstract
Can AI help radiologists with prostate MRI interpretation?
Accepted
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
Log inReferences
1. Kratzer TB, Mazzitelli N, Star J, Dahut WL, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Prostate cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. Sep 02 2025;doi:10.3322/caac.70028 [doi]
2. Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. Feb 25 2017;389(10071):815-822. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1 [doi]
3. Ahdoot M, Wilbur AR, Reese SE, et al. MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. Mar 05 2020;382(10):917-928. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1910038 [doi]
4. van der Leest M, Cornel E, Israël B, et al. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study. Eur Urol. Apr 2019;75(4):570-578. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023 [doi]
5. Brajtbord JS, Lavery HJ, Nabizada-Pace F, Senaratne P, Samadi DB. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging has limited clinical ability to preoperatively predict pT3 prostate cancer. BJU Int. May 2011;107(9):1419-24. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09599.x [doi]
6. Barentsz JO, Weinreb JC, Verma S, et al. Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use. Eur Urol. Jan 2016;69(1):41-9. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.038 [doi]
7. Rosenzweig B, Laitman Y, Zilberman DE, et al. Effects of "real life" prostate MRI inter-observer variability on total needle samples and indication for biopsy. Urol Oncol. Oct 2020;38(10):793.e13-793.e18. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.015 [doi]
8. Westphalen AC, McCulloch CE, Anaokar JM, et al. Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel. Radiology. Jul 2020;296(1):76-84. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020190646 [doi]
9. Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SAA, Petersen J, Maier-Hein KH. nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods. Feb 2021;18(2):203-211. doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z [doi]
10. Lee JH, Li CX, Jahanandish H, et al. Prostate-Specific Foundation Models for Enhanced Detection of Clinically Significant Cancer. [Preprint] arXiv 2025;doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.00366 . [doi]
11. Li CX, Bhattacharya I, Vesal S, et al. ProstAtlasDiff: Prostate cancer detection on MRI using Diffusion Probabilistic Models guided by population spatial cancer atlases. Med Image Anal. Apr 2025;101:103486. doi:10.1016/j.media.2025.103486 [doi]
12. Saha A, Bosma JS, Twilt JJ, et al. Artificial intelligence and radiologists in prostate cancer detection on MRI (PI-CAI): an international, paired, non-inferiority, confirmatory study. Lancet Oncol. Jul 2024;25(7):879-887. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00220-1 [doi]
13. Natarajan S, Priester A, Margolis D, Huang J, Marks L. Data from: Prostate MRI and Ultrasound With Pathology and Coordinates of Tracked Biopsy (Prostate-MRI-US-Biopsy). The Cancer Imaging Archive. 2020;2. doi:10.7937/TCIA.2020.A61IOC1A [doi]
Cite this abstract
http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/366-03-005