Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
364-04-008 ISMRM Abstract

MRI Reconstruction using Diffusion with Iterative Colored Renoising (DDfire)

Accepted
Matthew C Bendel1, Philip Schniter1, Rizwan Ahmad2
1Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States of America
2Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States of America
Presenting Author: Syed Murtaza Arshad

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. M. Bendel, R. Ahmad, and P. Schniter, “Solving inverse problems using diffusion with iterative colored renoising,” Trans. on Mach. Learn., Aug. 2025.
2. J. Song, C. Meng, and S. Ermon, “Denoising diffusion implicit models,” in Proc. Intl. Conf. Learn. Rep., 2021.
3. T. Karras, M. Aittala, T. Aila, and S. Laine, “Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models,” in Proc. Neural Info. Process. Syst. Conf., vol. 35, pp. 26565–26577, 2022.
4. J. Zbontar, F. Knoll, A. Sriram, M. J. Muckley, M. Bruno, A. Defazio, M. Parente, K. J. Geras, J. Katsnelson, H. Chandarana, Z. Zhang, M. Drozdzal, A. Romero, M. Rabbat, P. Vincent, J. Pinkerton, D. Wang, N. Yakubova, E. Owens, C. L. Zitnick, M. P. Recht, D. K. Sodickson, and Y. W. Lui, “fastMRI: An open dataset and benchmarks for accelerated MRI,” arXiv:1811.08839, 2018.
5. R. Sanda, A. Aali, A. Johnston, E. Reis, J. Singh, G. Wetzstein, and S. Fridovich-Keil, “Padis-mri: Patch-based diffusion for data-efficient, radiologist-preferred mri reconstruction.” https://github.com/voilalab/PaDIS-MRI, 2025. Accessed: 2025-10-07.
6. R. Zhang, P. Isola, A. A. Efros, E. Shechtman, and O. Wang, “The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comp. Vision Pattern Recog., pp. 586–595, 2018.
7. A. Sriram, J. Zbontar, T. Murrell, A. Defazio, C. L. Zitnick, N. Yakubova, F. Knoll, and P. Johnson, “End-to-end variational networks for accelerated MRI reconstruction,” in Proc. Intl. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Intervent., pp. 64–73, 2020.
8. M. Bendel, R. Ahmad, and P. Schniter, “A regularized conditional GAN for posterior sampling in inverse problems,” in Proc. Neural Info. Process. Syst. Conf., 2023.
9. M. Bendel, R. Ahmad, and P. Schniter, “pcaGAN: Improving posterior-sampling cGANs via principal component regularization,” in Proc. Neural Info. Process. Syst. Conf., 2024.
10. K. Ding, K. Ma, S. Wang, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: Unifying structure and texture similarity,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 2567–2581, 2020.
11. M. Heusel, H. Ramsauer, T. Unterthiner, B. Nessler, and S. Hochreiter, “GANs trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local Nash equilibrium,” in Proc. Neural Info. Process. Syst. Conf., vol. 30, 2017.
12. M. Soloveitchik, T. Diskin, E. Morin, and A. Wiesel, “Conditional Frechet inception distance,” arXiv:2103.11521, 2021.

Cite this abstract