Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
460-04-006 ISMRM Abstract

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRF Improves Detection of Induced Vascular Perfusion Reduction in a Mouse Breast Cancer Model

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Quantitative Imaging: relaxometry, multi-parametric, MR Fingerprinting, and synthetic MRI
Secondary: Contrast Mechanisms - Perfusion
460-04-006 · Breast MRI Sequences and Clinical Developments · Tuesday, 12 May, 2:35 PM–3:30 PM · Digital Posters Row A
Keywords: MR Fingerprinting Breast cancer Animal mouse model Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Pharmacokinetic Modeling
Accepted
Christina J MacAskill 1, Bernadette O Erokwu2, Yuran Zhu1, Guanhua Wang3, Andrew Dupuis2,4, Barbara J Schiemann5, Gopalakrishnan Ramamurthy2, Chetan B Dhakan6, Michael Kavran2, Chunying Wu2, William P Schiemann5, Yilun Sun7,8, Mark Griswold1,2,4,9,10, Xin Yu1, Mark D Pagel11, Chris Flask2,7
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States of America
2Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States of America
3Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America
4Department of Radiology, University Hospitals, Cleveland, United States of America
5Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States of America
6Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, United States of America
7Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States of America
8Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States of America
9University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
10Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
11Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, United States of America
Presenting Author: Christina J MacAskill

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Berman RM, Brown AM, Chang SD, Sankineni S, Kadakia M, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Choyke PL, Turkbey B. DCE MRI of prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 May;41(5):844–853. PMID: 27193787 [pmid]
2. Dijkhoff RAP, Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Beets GL, Maas M. Value of DCE-MRI for staging and response evaluation in rectal cancer: A systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Oct;95:155–168. PMID: 28987662 [pmid]
3. Gaustad JV, Hauge A, Wegner CS, Simonsen TG, Lund KV, Hansem LMK, Rofstad EK. DCE-MRI of Tumor Hypoxia and Hypoxia-Associated Aggressiveness. Cancers (Basel). 2020 July 20;12(7). PMID: 32698525 [pmid]
4. Heye AK, Culling RD, Valdés Hernández MDC, Thrippleton MJ, Wardlaw JM. Assessment of blood-brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review. Neuroimage Clin. 2014;6:262–274. PMID: 25379439 [pmid]
5. Pinker K, Helbich TH, Morris EA. The potential of multiparametric MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol. 2017 Jan;90(1069):20160715. PMID: 27805423 [pmid]
6. Di Giovanni P, Azlan CA, Ahearn TS, Semple SI, Gilbert FJ, Redpath TW. The accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameter measurement in DCE-MRI of the breast at 3 T. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jan 7;55(1):121–132. PMID: 20009182 [pmid]
7. Lavini C. Simulating the effect of input errors on the accuracy of Tofts' pharmacokinetic model parameters. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Feb;33(2):222-35. PMID: 25308097 [pmid]
8. Wake N, Chandarana H, Rusinek H, Fujimoto K, Moy L, Sodickson DK, Kim SG. Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: how should one estimate contrast concentration? Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Oct;52:16–23. PMID: 29777820 [pmid]
9. Bane O, Hectors SJ, Wagner M, Arlinghaus LL, Aryal MP, Cao Y, Chenevert TL, Fennessy F, Huang W, Hylton NM, Kalpathy‐Cramer J, Keenan KE, Malyarenko DI, Mulkern RV, Newitt DC, Russek SE, Stupic KF, Tudorica A, Wilmes LJ, Yankeelov TE, Yen Y, Boss MA, Taouli B. Accuracy, repeatability, and interplatform reproducibility of T1 quantification methods used for DCE‐MRI: Results from a multicenter phantom study. Magnetic Resonance in Med. 2018 May;79(5):2564–2575. PMID: 28913930 [pmid]
10. Kim H. Variability in Quantitative DCE-MRI: Sources and Solutions. Journal of nature and science. 2018;4(1):e484. PMID: 29527572 [pmid]
11. MacAskill CJ, Zhu Y, Wang G, Erokwu BO, Dhakan CB, Dupuis A, Schiemann BJ, Kavran M, Wu C, Schiemann WP, Griswold MA, Yu X, Pagel MD, Flask CA. Dynamic contrast enhanced-magnetic resonance fingerprinting (DCE-MRF): A new quantitative MRI method to reliably assess tumor vascular perfusion. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2025;94(6):2578–2592. PMID: 40808280 [pmid]
12. Zhu Y, Wang G, Gu Y, Zhao W, Lu J, Zhu J, MacAskill CJ, Dupuis A, Griswold MA, Ma D, Flask CA, Yu X. 3D MR fingerprinting for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of whole mouse brain. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2025;93(1):67–79. PMID: 39164799 [pmid]
13. Zhao B, Setsompop K, Adalsteinsson E, Gagoski B, Ye H, Ma D, Jiang Y, Grant PE, Griswold MA, Wald LL. Improved Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting Reconstruction with Low-Rank and Subspace Modeling. Magn Reson Med. 2018 Feb;79(2):933–942. PMID: 28411394 [pmid]
14. Zhao D, Richer E, Antich PP, Mason RP. Antivascular effects of combretastatin A4 phosphate in breast cancer xenograft assessed using dynamic bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). FASEB J. 2008 July;22(7):2445–2451. PMID: 18263704 [pmid]
15. Liu L, O’Kelly D, Schuetze R, Carlson G, Zhou H, Trawick ML, Pinney KG, Mason RP. Non-Invasive Evaluation of Acute Effects of Tubulin Binding Agents: A Review of Imaging Vascular Disruption in Tumors. Molecules. 2021 Apr 27;26(9):2551. PMID: 33925707 [pmid]
16. Cárdenas-Rodríguez J, Howison CM, Pagel MD. A linear algorithm of the reference region model for DCE-MRI is robust and relaxes requirements for temporal resolution. Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 May;31(4):497–507. PMID: 23228309 [pmid]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/460-04-006