Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens 1, Seonyeong Shin1,2, N. Jon Shah1,2,3,4,5
1Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 4, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
2RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
3Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
4Aachen, JARA - BRAIN - Translational Medicine, Aachen, Germany
5Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 11, INM-11, JARA, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany
Presenting Author: Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens
Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
1. Rasmussen MK, Mestre H, Nedergaard M. The glymphatic pathway in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(11):1016–1024. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30318-1. [doi]
2. Wåhlin A, et al. Four-dimensional flow MRI for quantitative assessment of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. NMR Biomed. 2022;35:e5082. doi:10.1002/nbm.5082. [doi]
3. Vikner T, et al. CSF dynamics throughout the ventricular system using 4D flow MRI. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2024;21:48. doi:10.1186/s12987-024-00570-4. [doi]
4. Mestre H, et al. Flow of cerebrospinal fluid is driven by arterial pulsations and is reduced in hypertension. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4878. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07318-3. [doi]
5. Eisenmenger L, et al. Quantifying cerebrospinal fluid dynamics: a review of human imaging methods. NeuroImage Clin. 2022;36:103268. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103268. [doi]
6. Taoka T, Naganawa S. Evaluation of glymphatic system activity with DTI-ALPS. Jpn J Radiol. 2017;35(4):172–178.
7. Taoka T, Ito R, Nakamichi R, Nakane T, Kawai H, Naganawa S. DTI‑ALPS: Revisiting the meaning and significance of the method. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2024; advance online publication. doi:10.2463/mrms.mp.2024-0088. [doi]
8. Yablonskiy DA, Haacke EM. Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: the static dephasing regime. Magn Reson Med. 1994;32(6):749–763.
9. Shin S, Oros‑Peusquens A‑M, Yun SD, Farrher E, Shah NJ. Development of an echo‑shifted, multi‑echo, gradient‑echo sequence for T2* quantification of slow‑relaxing water pools. Magn Reson Med. 2025; doi:10.1002/mrm.30624. [doi]
10. Reese TG, Heid O, Weisskoff RM. Reduction of eddy‑current‑induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice‑refocused spin echo. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49(1):177–182.
11. Pipe JG, et al. Flow‑compensated diffusion encoding in MRI (velocity‑moment nulling). Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:963–969.
12. Finsterbusch J. Principles of flow‑compensated diffusion encoding. J Magn Reson. 2009;200:100–108.
13. Porter DA, Heidemann RM. High resolution DWI using readout‑segmented EPI with 2D navigator. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62(2):468–475.
14. Rostgaard N, et al. Differential proteomic profile of lumbar and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2023;20:6. doi:10.1186/s12987-022-00405-0. [doi]
15. Reiber H. Non‑linear ventriculo–lumbar protein gradients validate the diffusion‑flow model for the blood–CSF barrier. Clin Chim Acta. 2021;513:64–67.
16. Courtney, Y., Lehtinen, M.K. Apocrine secretion by the choroid plexus. Fluids Barriers CNS 22, 75 (2025).
17. Shin S, Oros-Peusquens A, Yun S, Farrher E, Shah NJ. Development of a novel sequence for T2* quantification of slow-relaxing water pools in the brain. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, Canada. 2023;0666