Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
531-01-006 / 531-01-006 ISMRM Abstract

Longitudinal Stability of 3D-MR Fingerprinting in Clinical Patient Populations

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Quantitative Imaging: relaxometry, multi-parametric, MR Fingerprinting, and synthetic MRI
Secondary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Quantitative Imaging: head and neck
531-01-006 · Quantitative Imaging: Applications · Wednesday, 13 May, 8:20 AM–9:56 AM · Roof Terrace
531-01-006 · Quantitative Imaging: Applications · Wednesday, 13 May, 8:20 AM–9:56 AM · Roof Terrace
Accepted
Andrew Dupuis 1, Robin S Ghotra1, Egheoise Otaigbe1, Mark Griswold1,2,3, Chaitra Badve3, Rasim Boyacioglu2,3
1Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States of America
2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States of America
3Department of Radiology, University Hospitals, Cleveland, United States of America
Presenting Author: Andrew Dupuis

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Ma D, et al. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature 2013;495:187-192.
2. Jiang Y, et al. Repeatability of magnetic resonance fingerprinting T1 and T2 estimates assessed using the ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom. Magn Reson Med 2017;78:1452-1457.
3. Shridhar Konar A, et al. Quantitative imaging metrics derived from magnetic resonance fingerprinting using ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom. Med Phys 2021;48:2438-2447.
4. Dupuis A, et al. Quantifying 3D MR fingerprinting reproducibility across subjects, sessions, and scanners automatically using MNI atlases. Magn Reson Med 2024;91:2074-2088.
5. Buonincontri G, et al. Multi-site repeatability and reproducibility of MR fingerprinting of the healthy brain at 1.5 and 3.0 T. Neuroimage 2021;226:117573.
6. Keenan KE, et al. Recommendations towards standards for quantitative MRI (qMRI) and outstanding needs. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;49:e26-e39.
7. Karakuzu A, et al. Vendor-neutral sequences and fully transparent workflows improve inter-vendor reproducibility of quantitative MRI. Magn Reson Med 2022;88:1212-1228.

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/531-01-006