Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
452-03-015 / 452-03-015 ISMRM Abstract

Latent Space Fusion with Conditional Flow Matching for slice to volume Reconstruction

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - AI methods
Secondary: Analysis Methods - Generative Models
452-03-015 · Next-Generation MRI Image Enhancement · Tuesday, 12 May, 4:00 PM–5:36 PM · Power Pitch Theatre 2
452-03-015 · Next-Generation MRI Image Enhancement · Tuesday, 12 May, 4:00 PM–5:36 PM · Power Pitch Theatre 2
Keywords: Slice-to-volume reconstruction Super-resolution 3D MRI Generative AI
Accepted
Yunzhi Xu 1, Jiaxin Zheng1, Liangchen Shi1, Zhenyu Zhang1, Ruoge Lin1, Li Zhao1
1College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Presenting Author: Yunzhi Xu

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. M. Nishida et al., “Detailed semiautomated MRI based morphometry of the neonatal brain: Preliminary results,” NeuroImage, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1041–1049, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.020. [doi]
2. L. Zöllei, J. E. Iglesias, Y. Ou, P. E. Grant, and B. Fischl, “Infant FreeSurfer: An automated segmentation and surface extraction pipeline for T1-weighted neuroimaging data of infants 0–2 years,” NeuroImage, vol. 218, p. 116946, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116946. [doi]
3. A. Gholipour et al., “Fetal MRI: A technical update with educational aspirations,” Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 237–266, 2014, doi: 10.1002/cmr.a.21321. [doi]
4. A. Uus et al., “Deformable Slice-to-Volume Registration for Motion Correction of Fetal Body and Placenta MRI,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2750–2759, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2020.2974844. [doi]
5. B. Kainz et al., “Fast volume reconstruction from motion corrupted stacks of 2D slices,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 34, pp. 1901–13, 2015, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2415453. [doi]
6. F. Rousseau et al., “Registration-Based Approach for Reconstruction of High-Resolution In Utero Fetal MR Brain Images,” Academic Radiology, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1072–1081, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.05.003. [doi]
7. S. Jiang, H. Xue, A. Glover, M. Rutherford, D. Rueckert, and J. V. Hajnal, “MRI of Moving Subjects Using Multislice Snapshot Images With Volume Reconstruction (SVR): Application to Fetal, Neonatal, and Adult Brain Studies,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 967–980, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2007.895456. [doi]
8. P.-H. Yeung, M. Aliasi, A. T. Papageorghiou, M. Haak, W. Xie, and A. I. L. Namburete, “Learning to map 2D ultrasound images into 3D space with minimal human annotation,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 70, p. 101998, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.101998. [doi]
9. B. Hou et al., “3-D reconstruction in canonical co-ordinate space from arbitrarily oriented 2-D images,” Ieee Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 37, pp. 1737–1750, 2017, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2798801. [doi]
10. J. Xu, D. Moyer, P. Grant, P. Golland, J. E. Iglesias, and E. Adalsteinsson, “SVoRT: Iterative transformer for slice-to-volume registration in fetal brain MRI,” Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, vol. 13436, pp. 3–13, 2022, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2206.10802. [doi]
11. S. I. Young, Y. Balbastre, B. Fischl, P. Golland, and J. E. Iglesias, “Fully Convolutional Slice-to-Volume Reconstruction for Single-Stack MRI,” Feb. 28, 2024, arXiv: arXiv:2312.03102. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2312.03102. [doi]
12. J. E. Iglesias et al., “SynthSR: A public AI tool to turn heterogeneous clinical brain scans into high-resolution T1-weighted images for 3D morphometry,” Science Advances, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add3607. [doi]
13. Y. Lipman, R. T. Q. Chen, H. Ben-Hamu, M. Nickel, and M. Le, “Flow Matching for Generative Modeling,” Feb. 08, 2023, arXiv: arXiv:2210.02747. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2210.02747. [doi]
14. M. Yazdani, Y. Medghalchi, P. Ashrafian, I. Hacihaliloglu, and D. Shahriari, “Flow Matching for Medical Image Synthesis: Bridging the Gap Between Speed and Quality,” Mar. 01, 2025, arXiv: arXiv:2503.00266. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.00266. [doi]
15. D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes,” Dec. 10, 2022, arXiv: arXiv:1312.6114. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1312.6114. [doi]
16. M. Ebner et al., “An automated framework for localization, segmentation and super-resolution reconstruction of fetal brain MRI,” NeuroImage, vol. 206, p. 116324, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116324. [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/452-03-015