Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
467-05-012
ISMRM Abstract
Estimating the visibility of MAGnetic resonance Invisible Coil (MAGIC) to PET and MRI systems in sequential PET-MRI: Part 1
Accepted
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
Log inReferences
1. Ziegenfeuter, J.; Delbridge, C.; Bernhardt, D.; Gempt, J.; Schmidt-Graf, F.; Griessmair, M.; Thomas, M.; Meyer, H.S.; Zimmer, C.; Meyer, B.; et al. Sequential and Hybrid PET/MRI Acquisition in Follow-Up Examination of Glioblastoma Show Similar Diagnostic Performance. Cancers 2023, 15, 83.
2. Nakajima, S., Fushimi, Y., Hinoda, T. et al. Brain imaging of sequential acquisition using a flexible PET scanner and 3-T MRI: quantitative and qualitative assessment. Ann Nucl Med 37, 209–218 (2023).
3. M. Mayekar, J. Adams, ‘MAGnetic Resonance Invisible Coil (MAGIC) using liquid metal for Sequential PET-MRI image acquisition,’ Proc. of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) 33, 1520, Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, USA, 2025.
4. Rieke, V., Ganguly, A., Daniel, B.L., Scott, G., Pauly, J.M., Fahrig, R., Pelc, N.J. and Butts, K. (2005), X-ray compatible radiofrequency coil for magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med., 53: 1409-1414.
5. Stefan E Zijlema et al., Improving the imaging performance of the 1.5 T MR-linac using a flexible, 32-channel, on-body receive array, 2020 Phys. Med. Biol. 65 215008.
6. Stefan E Zijlema et al., Minimizing the need for coil attenuation correction in integrated PET/MRI at 1.5 T using low-density MR-linac receive arrays, Physics in Medicine & Biology 2021, 66 20NT01.
7. Villamizar-Martinez LA, Losey J. Assessment of the Occupational Radiation Dose from a Handheld Portable X-ray Unit During Full-mouth Intraoral Dental Radiographs in the Dog and the Cat – A Pilot Study. Journal of Veterinary Dentistry. 2023;41(2):106-113.
8. https://www.midmark.com/animal-health/products/digital-dental-x-ray/detail/midmark-dc-digital-radiography
9. Nitschke, J., Schorn, L., Holtmann, H. et al. Image quality of a portable X-ray device (Nomad Pro 2) compared to a wall-mounted device in intraoral radiography. Oral Radiol 37, 224–230 (2021).
10. Sander, C.Y., Keil, B., Chonde, D.B., Rosen, B.R., Catana, C. and Wald, L.L. (2015), A 31-channel MR brain array coil compatible with positron emission tomography. Magn. Reson. Med., 73: 2363-2375.
11. Barta R, Volotovskyy V, Wachowic K, Fallone BG, De Zanche N. How thin can you go? Performance of thin copper and aluminum RF coil conductors. Magn. Reson. Med. 2021; 85: 2327–2333.
12. Homann, Thomas, Klink, Fabian, Boese, Axel, Fischer, Karin, Beuing, Oliver and Rose, Georg. "Development of a skull phantom for the assessment of implant X-ray visibility" Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, 2016, pp. 351-354.
13. https://xorantech.com/vetcat/
14. https://www.microdicom.com/
15. D. Nygren, ‘MRAC capable phantom fluids : A study of hybrid phantom fluids for attenuation correction in PET/MRI and PET/CT’, Dissertation, 2021.
16. A Renner et al., A head coil system with an integrated orbiting transmission point source mechanism for attenuation correction in PET/MRI, 2018 Phys. Med. Biol. 63 225014.
17. Motovilova E, Aronowitz E, Vincent J, et al. Silicone-based materials with tailored MR relaxation characteristics for use in reduced coil visibility and in tissue-mimicking phantom design. Med Phys. 2023; 50: 3498–3510.
Cite this abstract
http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/467-05-012