Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
462-01-010 Registered Abstract

Evaluating QSM based methods for estimating [Gd] in breast DCE-MRI across a range of temporal resolutions

Primary: Contrast Mechanisms - Susceptibility/QSM
Secondary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Artifacts and Correction Strategies
462-01-010 · Contrast Mechanisms Potpourri Including Registered/Clinical Abstracts · Tuesday, 12 May, 8:20 AM–9:15 AM · Digital Posters Row C
Keywords: Breast Imaging DCE-MRI GRASP Contrast enhanced MRI Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM)
Accepted
Martin Kostal1, Gene Kim1,2,3,4, Pascal Spincemaille 1,2,5, Alexey Dimov1,2,5, Yi Wang2,5,6,7
1Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States of America
2Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States of America
3Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States of America
4Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, United States of America
5Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States of America
6Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States of America
7Department Radiology & Biomedical Engineering, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, United States of America
Presenting Author: Alexandra G Roberts

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Hypothesis:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. de Rochefort, Ludovic, et al. “In Vivoquantification of Contrast Agent Concentration Using the Induced Magnetic Field for Time-Resolved Arterial Input Function Measurement with MRI.” Medical Physics, vol. 35, no. 12, 6 Nov. 2008, pp. 5328–5339, https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3002309. [doi]
2. Dymerska, Barbara, et al. “Phase Unwrapping with a Rapid Opensource Minimum Spanning Tree Algorithm (ROMEO).” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 85, no. 4, 26 Oct. 2020, pp. 2294–2308, https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28563. [doi]
3. Feng, Li, et al. “Golden-Angle Radial Sparse Parallel MRI: Combination of Compressed Sensing, Parallel Imaging, and Golden-Angle Radial Sampling for Fast and Flexible Dynamic Volumetric MRI.” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 72, no. 3, 18 Oct. 2013, pp. 707–717, https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24980. [doi]
4. Liu, Zhe, et al. “MEDI+0: Morphology Enabled Dipole Inversion with Automatic Uniform Cerebrospinal Fluid Zero Reference for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 79, no. 5, 11 Oct. 2017, pp. 2795–2803, https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26946. [doi]
5. Rohrer, Martin, et al. “Comparison of Magnetic Properties of MRI Contrast Media Solutions at Different Magnetic Field Strengths.” Investigative Radiology, vol. 40, no. 11, Nov. 2005, pp. 715–724, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000184756.66360.d3. [doi]
6. Wake, Nicole, et al. “Accuracy and Precision of Quantitative DCE-MRI Parameters: How Should One Estimate Contrast Concentration?” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 52, Oct. 2018, pp. 16–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2018.05.007. [doi]
7. Wang, Yi. Principles of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. CreateSpace, 3 Oct. 2012.
8. Zhou, Dong, et al. “Background Field Removal by Solving the Laplacian Boundary Value

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/462-01-010