Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
560-02-003 ISMRM Abstract

A Novel Numerical Phantom for Simultaneous QSM and EPT: Design and Evaluation

Primary: Contrast Mechanisms - Electromagnetic Tissue Properties
Secondary: Contrast Mechanisms - Susceptibility/QSM
560-02-003 · New Developments in QSM II · Wednesday, 13 May, 9:15 AM–10:10 AM · Digital Posters Row A
Keywords: Brain Electromagnetic Tissue Properties Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Digital phantom Electrical properties tomography (EPT)
Accepted
Philippa Sha 1, Jierong Luo1, Patrick S Fuchs1,2, Karin Shmueli1
1Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
2imec - Vision Lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Presenting Author: Philippa Sha

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Shmueli, K. Advances in MR Technology & Applications. 2020; 819-38. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-817057-1.00033-0 [doi]
2. Katscher, U. Advances in MR Technology & Applications. 2020; 807-817. doi:10.1002/nbm.3729 [doi]
3. Liu, C. et al. Tomography. 2015; 1(1):3-17. doi:10.18383/j.tom.2015.00136 [doi]
4. Eskreis-Winkler, S. et al. NMR Biomed. 2016; 30(4):e3668. doi:10.1002/nbm.3668 [doi]
5. Hancu, I. et al. MRM. 2019; 81(2):803-10. doi:10.1002/mrm.27453 [doi]
6. Kim, D-H. et al. MRM. 2013; 71(3):1144-50. doi:10.1002/mrm.24759 [doi]
7. Kiersnowski, O.C. et al. Proc. Ann. Meeting ISMRM. 2024; 0188.
8. Marques, J.P. et al. MRM. 2021; 86(1):526-42. doi:10.1002/mrm.28716 [doi]
9. Mandija, S. et al. Proc. Ann. Meeting ISMRM. 2022; 0704.
10. Jenkinson, M. et al. Med. Image Analysis. 2001; 5(2):143-56. doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(01)00036-6 [doi]
11. Jenkinson, M. et al. NeuroImage. 2002; 17(2):825-41. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 [doi]
12. QSM Consensus Org. Comm. et al. MRM. 2024; 91(5):1834-62. doi:10.1002/mrm.30006 [doi]
13. Karsa, A. et al. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2019; 38(6):1347-57. doi:10.1109/TMI.2018.2884093 [doi]
14. Liu, T. et al. NMR Biomed. 2011; 24(9):1129-39. doi:10.1002/nbm.1670 [doi]
15. Smith, S.M. Human Brain Mapping. 2002; 17(3):143-55. doi:10.1002/hbm.10062 [doi]
16. Karsa, A. et al. Proc. Ann. Meeting ISMRM. 2022; 2462.
17. Karsa, A. et al. MRM. 2020; 84(6):3206-22. doi:10.1002/mrm.28377 [doi]
18. Milovic, C. et al. MRM. 2018; 80(2):814-21. doi:10.1002/mrm.27073 [doi]
19. Milovic, C. et al. MRM. 2019; 81(2):1399-1411. doi:10.1002/mrm.27483 [doi]
20. Milovic, C. et al. Proc. Ann. Meeting ISMRM. 2021; 3982.
21. Karsa, A. et al. Proc. Ann. Meeting ISMRM. 2021; 2774.

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/560-02-003