Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
365-05-008 ISMRM Abstract

Dynamic view ordering for motion artefact reduction in brain MRI

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Pulse Sequence Design and Spatial Encoding Methods
Secondary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Motion Correction: Neuro
365-05-008 · Novel Acquisition Methods · Monday, 11 May, 4:10 PM–5:05 PM · Digital Posters Row F
Keywords: Real-time MRI Neuroimaging Sampling algorithm Motion robust View order
Accepted
Sophie Schauman 1, Henric Rydén1,2, Adam van Niekerk1, Ola Norbeck1,2, Enrico Avventi1,2, Tim Sprenger3, Stefan Skare1,2
1Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
2Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
3GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany
Presenting Author: Sophie Schauman

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Maclaren J, Herbst M, Speck O, Zaitsev M. Prospective motion correction in brain imaging: A review. Magnetic Resonance in Med. 2013;69(3):621-636. doi:10.1002/mrm.24314 [doi]
2. Zaitsev M, Dold C, Sakas G, Hennig J, Speck O. Magnetic resonance imaging of freely moving objects: prospective real-time motion correction using an external optical motion tracking system. NeuroImage. 2006;31(3):1038-1050. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.039 [doi]
3. Tisdall MD, Hess AT, Reuter M, Meintjes EM, Fischl B, Van Der Kouwe AJW. Volumetric navigators for prospective motion correction and selective reacquisition in neuroanatomical MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Med. 2012;68(2):389-399. doi:10.1002/mrm.23228 [doi]
4. Slipsager JM, Glimberg SL, Højgaard L, et al. Comparison of prospective and retrospective motion correction in 3D‐encoded neuroanatomical MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Med. 2022;87(2):629-645. doi:10.1002/mrm.28991 [doi]
5. Polak D, Hossbach J, Splitthoff DN, et al. Motion guidance lines for robust data consistency–based retrospective motion correction in 2D and 3D MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Med. 2023;89(5):1777-1790. doi:10.1002/mrm.29534 [doi]
6. Cordero‐Grande L, Ferrazzi G, Teixeira RPAG, O’Muircheartaigh J, Price AN, Hajnal JV. Motion‐corrected MRI with DISORDER: Distributed and incoherent sample orders for reconstruction deblurring using encoding redundancy. Magnetic Resonance in Med. 2020;84(2):713-726. doi:10.1002/mrm.28157 [doi]
7. Schauman S, van Niekerk A, Norbeck O, et al. An exploration of motion-sampling interactions in 3D MRI for neuroimaging. Magnetic Resonance in Med. doi:10.1002/mrm.70132 [doi]
8. Ludwig J, Speier P, Seifert F, Schaeffter T, Kolbitsch C. Pilot tone–based motion correction for prospective respiratory compensated cardiac cine MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Med. 2021;85(5):2403-2416. doi:10.1002/mrm.28580 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/365-05-008