Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
460-04-011 ISMRM Abstract

Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Using Microstructural Parameters from td-dMRI: A Prospective Study

Primary: Diffusion - Microstructure
Secondary: Body - Breast
460-04-011 · Breast MRI Sequences and Clinical Developments · Tuesday, 12 May, 2:35 PM–3:30 PM · Digital Posters Row A
Keywords: Breast Diffusion Modeling Microstructure Quantitative Imaging Td-dMRI
Accepted
Le Fu 1, Yichen Wang2, Jiejun Cheng1,3, Jianli Yu1
1Radiology, Shanghai first maternity and infant hospital, Shanghai, China
2Collaborative Innovation Department, United Imaging Health Care Group Co., Shanghai, China
3The First Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai, China
Presenting Author: Le Fu

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Miller KD, et al. Breast Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2022;72(6):524–541. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21754 [doi]
2. Eriksson L, Bergh J, Humphreys K, Wärnberg F, Törnberg S, Czene K. Time from breast cancer diagnosis to therapeutic surgery and breast cancer prognosis: A population‐based cohort study. Int J Cancer 2018;143(5):1093–1104. doi:10.1002/ijc.31411 [doi]
3. Xu H, Xu B. Breast cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors and screening. Chin J Cancer Res 2023;35(6):565–583.doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.06.02 [doi]
4. Sickles EA. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology. 2013:39.
5. Mann RM, Balleyguier C, Baltzer PA, et al. Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women’s information. Eur Radiol 2015;25(12): 3669–3678.doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3807-z [doi]
6. Sassi A, Salminen A, Jukkola A, et al. Breast density and the likelihood of malignant MRI-detected lesions in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2023;33(11):8080–8088.doi:10.1007/s00330-023-10072-w [doi]
7. Chen Y, Wu B, Liu H, Wang D, Gu Y. Feasibility study of dual parametric 2D histogram analysis of breast lesions with dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI. J Transl Med 2018;16(1):325. doi:10.1186/s12967-018-1698-x [doi]
8. Ohlmeyer S, Laun FB, Palm T, et al. Simultaneous Multislice Echo Planar Imaging for Accelerated Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions. Invest Radiol 2019;54(8):524–530. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000560 [doi]
9. Yang X, Dong M, Li S, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging or dynamic con trast-enhanced curve: a retrospective analysis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging–based differential diagnoses of benign and malignant breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2020;30(9):4795–4805.doi:10.1007/s00330-020-06883-w [doi]
10. Wolberg WH, Mangasarian OL. Multisurface method of pattern separation for medical diagnosis applied to breast cytology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87(23):9193–9196. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.23.9193 [doi]
11. Ghiasi MM, Zendehboudi S. Application of decision tree-based ensemble learn ing in the classification of breast cancer. Comput Biol Med 2021;128:104089.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104089 [doi]
12. Tiling R, Stephan K, Sommer H, Shabani N, Linke R, Hahn K. Tissue-specific effects on uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi by breast lesions: a targeted analysis of false scintigraphic diagnoses. J Nucl Med 2004;45(11):1822–1828.PMID: 15534050 [pmid]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/460-04-011