Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
507-03-003
ISMRM Abstract
Endogenous CEST Signals Enable Simultaneous In Vivo pH and Temperature Mapping: A Proof-of-Principle Study
Accepted
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
Log inReferences
1. Webb BA, Chimenti M, Jacobson MP, et al. Dysregulated pH: a perfect storm for cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:671–677. doi: 10.1038/nrc3110. [doi]
2. Zhou J, Payen J-F, Wilson DA, et al. Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI. Nat Med. 2003;9:1085–1090. doi: 10.1038/nm907. [doi]
3. McVicar N, Li AX, Suchý M, et al. Simultaneous in vivo pH and temperature mapping using a PARACEST-MRI contrast agent. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70:1016–1025. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24539. [doi]
4. Cai S, Bie C, Zhou Y, et al. Brain temperature mapping based on chemical exchange saturation transfer signal at 2 ppm. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025;15:676–688. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1228. [doi]
5. Boyd PS, Breitling J, Korzowski A, et al. Mapping intracellular pH in tumors using amide and guanidyl CEST-MRI at 9.4 T. Magn Reson Med. 2022;87:2436–2452. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29133. [doi]
6. Boyd PS. Mapping intracellular pH of tumors in vivo using CEST-MRI: methodological development and preclinical investigation. Dissertation; University of Heidelberg 2022. DOI: 10.11588/heidok.00032083. [doi]
7. Boyd PS, Diederichs L, Breitling J, et al. Presaturation pulse shape enables shifting the pH sensitivity of guanidyl CEST-MRI for absolute pH mapping at 9.4 T. Proc 31st Annu Meet Int Soc Magn Reson Med.;(2022) Abstract #2803. https://archive.ismrm.org/2022/2803.html
8. Boyd PS, Kroh F, Breitling J, et al. Quantitative volumetric mapping of intracellular pH in the human brain at 7 T using endogenous CEST-MRI: A proof of principle study. Proc 32nd Annu Meet Int Soc Magn Reson Med.;(2023) Abstract #2998. https://archive.ismrm.org/2023/2998.html
9. Boyd PS, Lechner JC, Wirtz JB, et al. Towards Temperature-Corrected pH Mapping using CEST Imaging: Quantification of the Underlying Calibration as a Function of Temperature. Proc 33rd Annu Meet Int Soc Magn Reson Med.;(2024) Abstract #4456. https://archive.ismrm.org/2024/4456.html
10. Zaiss M, Ehses P, Scheffler K. Snapshot-CEST: Optimizing spiral-centric-reordered gradient echo acquisition for fast and robust 3D CEST MRI at 9.4 T. NMR Biomed. 2018;31:e3879. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3879. [doi]
11. Meissner J-E, Goerke S, Rerich E, et al. Quantitative pulsed CEST-MRI using Ω-plots. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:1196–1208. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3362. [doi]
12. Schuenke P, Windschuh J, Roeloffs V, et al. Simultaneous Mapping of Water Shift and B1 (WASABI)—Application to Field-Inhomogeneity Correction of CEST MRI Data. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77:571–580. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26133. [doi]
13. Korzowski A, Weinfurtner N, Mueller S, et al. Volumetric mapping of intra- and extracellular pH in the human brain using 31P MRSI at 7T. Magn Reson Med. 2020;84:1707–1723. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28255. [doi]
14. Franke VL, Breitling J, Boyd PS, et al. A versatile look-up algorithm for mapping pH values and magnesium ion content using 31P MRSI. NMR Biomed.;n/a:e5113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.5113. [doi]
15. Yoshioka Y, Oikawa H, Ehara S, et al. Noninvasive estimation of temperature and pH in human lower leg muscles using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Spectroscopy. 2002;16:183–190.
16. Goerke S, Zaiss M, Bachert P. Characterization of creatine guanidinium proton exchange by water-exchange (WEX) spectroscopy for absolute-pH CEST imaging in vitro. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:507–518. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3086. [doi]
17. Wermter FC, Bock C, Dreher W. Investigating GluCEST and its specificity for pH mapping at low temperatures. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:1507–1517. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3416. [doi]
18. Breitling J, Korzowski A, Kempa N, et al. Motion correction for three-dimensional chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging without direct water saturation artifacts. NMR Biomed. 2022;35:e4720. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4720. [doi]
19. Breitling J, Deshmane A, Goerke S, et al. Adaptive denoising for chemical exchange saturation transfer MR imaging. NMR Biomed. 2019;32:e4133. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4133. [doi]
20. Zaiss M, Xu J, Goerke S, et al. Inverse Z-spectrum analysis for spillover-, MT-, and T1-corrected steady-state pulsed CEST-MRI – application to pH-weighted MRI of acute stroke. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:240–252. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3054. [doi]
21. Zaiss M, Bachert P. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and MR Z-spectroscopy in vivo: a review of theoretical approaches and methods. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:R221–R269. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/22/R221. [doi]
22. Zaiss M, Bachert P. Exchange-dependent relaxation in the rotating frame for slow and intermediate exchange – modeling off-resonant spin-lock and chemical exchange saturation transfer. NMR Biomed. 2013;26:507–518. doi: 10.1002/nbm.2887. [doi]
23. Windschuh J, Zaiss M, Meissner J-E, et al. Correction of B1-inhomogeneities for relaxation-compensated CEST imaging at 7 T. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:529–537. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3283. [doi]
Cite this abstract
http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/507-03-003