Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
568-04-008
ISMRM Abstract
The value of APT weighted and diffusion kurtosis imaging in avoiding unnecessary biopsy in patients with PI-RADS score of 3-4
Accepted
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
Log inReferences
1. Siegel R L, Miller K D, Wagle N S, et al. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023. 73(1): 17-48.doi: 10.3322/caac.21763. [doi]
2. Dickinson L, Ahmed H U, Allen C, et al. Scoring systems used for the interpretation and reporting of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection, localization, and characterization: could standardization lead to improved utilization of imaging within the diagnostic pathway? J Magn Reson Imaging 2013. 37(1): 48-58.doi: 10.1002/jmri.23689. [doi]
3. Grivas N, Lardas M, Espinós E L, et al. Prostate Cancer Detection Percentages of Repeat Biopsy in Patients with Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System/Likert 3-5) and Negative Initial Biopsy. A Mini Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2022. 82(5): 452-457.doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.07.025. [doi]
4. Zhou J, Payen J F, Wilson D A, et al. Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI. Nat Med 2003. 9(8): 1085-90.doi: 10.1038/nm907. [doi]
5. Ward K M, Aletras A H, and Balaban R S A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST). J Magn Reson 2000. 143(1): 79-87.doi: 10.1006/jmre.1999.1956. [doi]
6. Jensen J H, Helpern J A, Ramani A, et al. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005. 53(6): 1432-40.doi: 10.1002/mrm.20508. [doi]
7. Yin H, Wang D, Yan R, et al. Comparison of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Amide Proton Transfer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Risk Assessment of Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2021. 11(640906.doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.640906. [doi]
8. Ye Y, Gong Z, Song Y, et al. Added value of amide proton transfer-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 in differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2024. 14(12): 9036-9048.doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1121. [doi]
9. Rajabi P, Rezakhaniha B, Galougahi M H K, et al. Unveiling the diagnostic potential of diffusion kurtosis imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion for detecting and characterizing prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024. 10.1007/s00261-024-04454-x. [doi]
10. Palumbo P, Martinese A, Antenucci M R, et al. Diffusion kurtosis imaging and standard diffusion imaging in the magnetic resonance imaging assessment of prostate cancer. Gland Surg 2023. 12(12): 1806-1822.doi: 10.21037/gs-23-53. [doi]
11. Yang L, Wang L, Tan Y, et al. Amide Proton Transfer-weighted MRI combined with serum prostate-specific antigen levels for differentiating malignant prostate lesions from benign prostate lesions: a retrospective cohort study. Cancer Imaging 2023. 23(1): 3.doi: 10.1186/s40644-022-00515-w. [doi]
12. Goffeney N, Bulte J W, Duyn J, et al. Sensitive NMR detection of cationic-polymer-based gene delivery systems using saturation transfer via proton exchange. J Am Chem Soc 2001. 123(35): 8628-9.doi: 10.1021/ja0158455. [doi]
13. Hambrock T, Somford D M, Huisman H J, et al. Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. Radiology 2011. 259(2): 453-61.doi: 10.1148/radiol.11091409. [doi]
Cite this abstract
http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/568-04-008