Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
365-03-008
ISMRM Abstract
Two-Step Fitting Enables Improved Precision of Simultaneous IVIM and Compartmental R2 Quantification
Accepted
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
Log inReferences
1. Simchick G, Allen TJ, Hernando D. Reproducibility of intravoxel incoherent motion quantification in the liver across field strengths and gradient hardware. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30237 PMID: 39119838 [doi] [pmid]
2. Jerome NP, d’Arcy JA, Feiweier T, et al. Extended T2-IVIM model for correction of TE dependence of pseudo-diffusion volume fraction in clinical diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Physics in Medicine & Biology. 2016;61(24):N667. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/61/24/N667 PMID: 27893459 [doi] [pmid]
3. Lemke A, Laun FB, Simon D, Stieltjes B, Schad LR. An in vivo verification of the intravoxel incoherent motion effect in diffusion‐weighted imaging of the abdomen. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2010;64(6):1580-1585. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22565 PMID: 20665824 [doi] [pmid]
4. Führes T, Riexinger AJ, Loh M, et al. Echo time dependence of biexponential and triexponential intravoxel incoherent motion parameters in the liver. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2022;87(2):859-871. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28996 PMID: 34453445 [doi] [pmid]
5. Riexinger AJ, Martin J, Rauh S, et al. On the field strength dependence of bi‐and triexponential intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters in the liver. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2019;50(6):1883-1892. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26730 PMID: 30941806 [doi] [pmid]
6. Simchick G, Hernando D. Optimized acquisition for simultaneous intravoxel incoherent motion and R2 quantification in the liver. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.70005 PMID: 40693380 [doi] [pmid]
7. Wurnig MC, Donati OF, Ulbrich E, et al. Systematic analysis of the intravoxel incoherent motion threshold separating perfusion and diffusion effects: Proposal of a standardized algorithm. Magn Reson Med. Nov 2015;74(5):1414-22. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25506 PMID: 25360990 [doi] [pmid]
8. Riexinger A, Martin J, Wetscherek A, et al. An optimized b‐value distribution for triexponential intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in the liver. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2021;85(4):2095-2108. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28582 PMID: 33201549 [doi] [pmid]
9. Cercueil J-P, Petit J-M, Nougaret S, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in the liver: comparison of mono-, bi-and tri-exponential modelling at 3.0-T. European radiology. 2015;25:1541-1550. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3554-6 PMID: 25527431 [doi] [pmid]
10. Chevallier O, Zhou N, Cercueil JP, He J, Loffroy R, Wáng YXJ. Comparison of tri‐exponential decay versus bi‐exponential decay and full fitting versus segmented fitting for modeling liver intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI. NMR in Biomedicine. 2019;32(11):e4155. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4155 PMID: 31361366 [doi] [pmid]
11. Ahlgren A, Knutsson L, Wirestam R, et al. Quantification of microcirculatory parameters by joint analysis of flow‐compensated and non‐flow‐compensated intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) data. NMR in Biomedicine. 2016;29(5):640-649. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3505 PMID: 26952166 [doi] [pmid]
12. While PT. A comparative simulation study of bayesian fitting approaches to intravoxel incoherent motion modeling in diffusion‐weighted MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2017;78(6):2373-2387. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26598 PMID: 28370232 [doi] [pmid]
13. Orton MR, Collins DJ, Koh DM, Leach MO. Improved intravoxel incoherent motion analysis of diffusion weighted imaging by data driven Bayesian modeling. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2014;71(1):411-420. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24649 PMID: 23408505 [doi] [pmid]
14. Luo G, Blumenthal M, Heide M, Uecker M. Bayesian MRI reconstruction with joint uncertainty estimation using diffusion models. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2023;90(1):295-311. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29624 PMID: 36912453 [doi] [pmid]
15. Barbieri S, Gurney‐Champion OJ, Klaassen R, Thoeny HC. Deep learning how to fit an intravoxel incoherent motion model to diffusion‐weighted MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2020;83(1):312-321. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27910 PMID: 31389081 [doi] [pmid]
16. Kaandorp MPT, Zijlstra F, Federau C, While PT. Deep learning intravoxel incoherent motion modeling: Exploring the impact of training features and learning strategies. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2023;90(1):312-328. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29628 PMID: 36912473 [doi] [pmid]
17. Zhou XX, Wang XY, Liu EH, et al. An unsupervised deep learning approach for dynamic‐exponential Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI modeling and parameter estimation in the liver. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2022;56(3):848-859. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28074 PMID: 35064945 [doi] [pmid]
18. Stabinska J, Zöllner HJ, Thiel TA, Wittsack HJ, Ljimani A. Image downsampling expedited adaptive least‐squares (IDEAL) fitting improves intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) analysis in the human kidney. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2023;89(3):1055-1067. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29517 PMID: 36416075 [doi] [pmid]
Cite this abstract
http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/365-03-008