Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
462-02-005 ISMRM Abstract

Data-driven optimal experimental design for diffusion-relaxation MRI

Primary: Diffusion - Diffusion Acquisition
Secondary: Diffusion - Diffusion Analysis & Visualization
462-02-005 · Diffusion MRI Neuroscience · Tuesday, 12 May, 9:15 AM–10:10 AM · Digital Posters Row C
Keywords: Acquisition Methods Relaxometry Diffusion-weighted MRI Optimal experimental design Diffusion relaxometry
Accepted
Patrick S Fuchs 1, Ben Jeurissen1
1imec - Vision Lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Presenting Author: Patrick S Fuchs

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. M. Cercignani and S. Bouyagoub, “Brain microstructure by multi-modal MRI: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts?,” Neuroimage, vol. 182, pp. 117–127, Nov. 2018.
2. D. C. Alexander, T. B. Dyrby, M. Nilsson, and H. Zhang, “Imaging brain microstructure with diffusion MRI: practicality and applications,” NMR Biomed., vol. 32, no. 4, p. e3841, Apr. 2019.
3. I. O. Jelescu, J. Veraart, E. Fieremans, and D. S. Novikov, “Degeneracy in model parameter estimation for multi-compartmental diffusion in neuronal tissue,” NMR Biomed., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 33–47, Jan. 2016.
4. J. Veraart, D. S. Novikov, and E. Fieremans, “TE dependent Diffusion Imaging (TEdDI) distinguishes between compartmental T2 relaxation times,” Neuroimage, vol. 182, pp. 360–369, Nov. 2018.
5. B. Lampinen et al., “Towards unconstrained compartment modeling in white matter using diffusion-relaxation MRI with tensor-valued diffusion encoding,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 1605–1623, Sep. 2020.
6. J.-D. Tournier, B. Jeurissen, and D. Christiaens, “Iterative model-based Rician bias correction and its application to denoising in diffusion MRI,” in Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med, in 31. 2023, p. 3795.
7. J. Veraart, D. S. Novikov, D. Christiaens, B. Ades-Aron, J. Sijbers, and E. Fieremans, “Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory,” Neuroimage, vol. 142, pp. 394–406, Nov. 2016.
8. E. Kellner, B. Dhital, V. G. Kiselev, and M. Reisert, “Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 1574–1581, Nov. 2016.
9. J. L. R. Andersson and S. N. Sotiropoulos, “An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging,” Neuroimage, vol. 125, pp. 1063–1078, Jan. 2016.
10. J.-D. Tournier et al., “A data-driven approach to optimising the encoding for multi-shell diffusion MRI with application to neonatal imaging,” NMR Biomed., vol. 33, no. 9, p. e4348, Sep. 2020.
11. C. Ding, T. Li, and M. I. Jordan, “Convex and semi-nonnegative matrix factorizations,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 45–55, Jan. 2010.
12. D. Christiaens, S. Sunaert, P. Suetens, and F. Maes, “Convexity-constrained and nonnegativity-constrained spherical factorization in diffusion-weighted imaging,” Neuroimage, vol. 146, pp. 507–517, Feb. 2017.
13. B. Jeurissen, J.-D. Tournier, T. Dhollander, A. Connelly, and J. Sijbers, “Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data,” Neuroimage, vol. 103, pp. 411–426, Dec. 2014.

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/462-02-005