Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
367-03-009 ISMRM Abstract

Qualitative comparison of voluntary and electrically evoked forearm muscle contractions with 3D dynamic phase-contrast MRI

Primary: Musculoskeletal - Functional/Dynamic
Secondary: Musculoskeletal - Muscle
367-03-009 · Muscle Microstructure and Deformation · Monday, 11 May, 1:50 PM–2:45 PM · Digital Posters Row H
Keywords: Strain differences Phase Contrast MRI Strain and Strain rate Muscle contraction Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
Accepted
Sabine Räuber 1,2, Marta B Maggioni1,2, Francesco Santini1,2
1Basel Muscle MRI, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
2Radiology, Division of Radiological Physics, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Presenting Author: Sabine Räuber

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Jubeau M, Gondin J, Martin A, Sartorio A, Maffiuletti N. Random Motor Unit Activation by Electrostimulation. Int J Sports Med. 2007;28(11):901-904.
2. Gregory CM, Bickel CS. Recruitment patterns in human skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation. Phys Ther. 2005;85(4):358-364.
3. Maffiuletti NA. Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;110(2):223-234. doi:10.1007/s00421-010-1502-y [doi]
4. Maffiuletti NA, Dirks ML, Stevens-Lapsley J, McNeil CJ. Electrical stimulation for investigating and improving neuromuscular function in vivo: Historical perspective and major advances. J Biomech. 2023;152:111582. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111582 [doi]
5. Santini F, Croce MG, Deligianni X, et al. Dynamic MR of muscle contraction during electrical muscle stimulation as a potential diagnostic tool for neuromuscular disease. Radiology and Imaging. Preprint posted online September 18, 2024. doi:10.1101/2024.09.17.24313673 [doi]
6. Deligianni X, Pansini M, Garcia M, et al. Synchronous MRI of muscle motion induced by electrical stimulation. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77(2):664-672. doi:10.1002/mrm.26154 [doi]
7. Ravi K, Geethanath S, Vaughan J. PyPulseq: A Python Package for MRI Pulse Sequence Design. J Open Source Softw. 2019;4(42):1725. doi:10.21105/joss.01725 [doi]
8. Maggioni M, Räuber S, Santini F. Vendor-agnostic, open-source 4D flow. In: 3208. doi:10.58530/2025/3208 [doi]
9. Book of Abstracts ESMRMB 2025 Online 41st Annual Scientific Meeting 8–11 October 2025. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med. Published online September 29, 2025:s10334-025-01278-8. doi:10.1007/s10334-025-01278-8 [doi]
10. Jubeau M, Le Fur Y, Duhamel G, et al. Localized Metabolic and T2 Changes Induced by Voluntary and Evoked Contractions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(5):921-930. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000491 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/367-03-009