Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
563-05-009 ISMRM Abstract

Arousal-Driven Dynamics of Frequency-Resolved Brain States in Resting-State fMRI

Accepted
Hüden Neşe 1, Elif Can1, Şirin Yağmur Abacı1, Pinar S Özbay1,2
1Boğaziçi University Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey
2Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey
Presenting Author: Hüden Neşe

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Tagliazucchi E, Laufs H. Decoding wakefulness levels from typical fMRI resting-state data reveals reliable drifts between wakefulness and sleep. Neuron. 2014;82(3):695-708. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.020 [doi]
2. Chang C, Leopold DA, Schölvinck ML, et al. Tracking brain arousal fluctuations with fMRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(16):4518-4523. doi:10.1073/pnas.1520613113 [doi]
3. Cabral J, Vidaurre D, Marques P, et al. Cognitive performance in healthy older adults relates to spontaneous switching between states of functional connectivity during rest. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5135. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05425-7 [doi]
4. Abe T. PERCLOS-based technologies for detecting drowsiness: current evidence and future directions. Sleep Adv. 2023;4(1):zpad006. doi:10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad006 [doi]
5. Celecia A, Figueiredo K, Vellasco M, González R. A portable fuzzy driver drowsiness estimation system. Sensors (Basel). 2020;20(15):4093. doi:10.3390/s20154093 [doi]
6. Cox RW. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res. 1996;29(3):162-173. doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 [doi]
7. Schaefer A, Kong R, Gordon EM, et al. Local-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Cereb Cortex. 2018;28(9):3095-3114. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx179 [doi]
8. Zuo XN, Di Martino A, Kelly C, et al. The oscillating brain: complex and reliable. Neuroimage. 2010;49(2):1432-1445. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.037 [doi]
9. Glerean E, Salmi J, Lahnakoski JM, Jääskeläinen IP, Sams M. Functional magnetic resonance imaging phase synchronization as a measure of dynamic functional connectivity. Brain Connect. 2012;2(2):91-101. doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0068 [doi]
10. Vidaurre D, Smith SM, Woolrich MW. Brain network dynamics are hierarchically organized in time. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(48):12827-12832. doi:10.1073/pnas.1705120114 [doi]
11. Deco G, Kringelbach ML, Jirsa VK, Ritter P. The dynamics of resting fluctuations in the brain: metastability and its dynamical cortical core. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3095. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03073-5 [doi]

Cite this abstract