Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
464-01-001
ISMRM Abstract
Comparison of Continuous Signal Representations for Multi-Tissue Spherical Deconvolution of Non-shelled Diffusion MRI Data
Accepted
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
Log inReferences
1. B. Jeurissen, J.-D. Tournier, T. Dhollander, A. Connelly, and J. Sijbers, ‘Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data’, NeuroImage, vol. 103, pp. 411–426, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.061. [doi]
2. V. J. Wedeen, P. Hagmann, W. I. Tseng, T. G. Reese, and R. M. Weisskoff, ‘Mapping complex tissue architecture with diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging’, Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1377–1386, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1002/mrm.20642. [doi]
3. D. S. Tuch, T. G. Reese, M. R. Wiegell, N. Makris, J. W. Belliveau, and V. J. Wedeen, ‘High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneity’, Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 577–582, Oct. 2002, doi: 10.1002/mrm.10268. [doi]
4. S. N. Sotiropoulos et al., ‘Advances in diffusion MRI acquisition and processing in the Human Connectome Project’, NeuroImage, vol. 80, pp. 125–143, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.057. [doi]
5. J. Morez, J. Sijbers, F. Vanhevel, and B. Jeurissen, ‘Constrained spherical deconvolution of nonspherically sampled diffusion MRI data’, Hum. Brain Mapp., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 521–538, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1002/hbm.25241. [doi]
6. J. H. Jensen, J. A. Helpern, A. Ramani, H. Lu, and K. Kaczynski, ‘Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging’, Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1432–1440, June 2005, doi: 10.1002/mrm.20508. [doi]
7. J. H. Jensen and J. A. Helpern, ‘MRI quantification of non‐Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis’, NMR Biomed., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 698–710, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1002/nbm.1518. [doi]
8. K. M. Bennett, K. M. Schmainda, R. Bennett (Tong), D. B. Rowe, H. Lu, and J. S. Hyde, ‘Characterization of continuously distributed cortical water diffusion rates with a stretched-exponential model’, Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 727–734, 2003, doi: 10.1002/mrm.10581. [doi]
9. D. S. Novikov, E. Fieremans, S. N. Jespersen, and V. G. Kiselev, ‘Quantifying brain microstructure with diffusion MRI: Theory and parameter estimation’, NMR Biomed., vol. 32, no. 4, p. e3998, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1002/nbm.3998. [doi]
10. T. R. Barrick, C. Ingo, M. G. Hall, and F. A. Howe, ‘Quasi‐Diffusion Imaging: Application to Ultra‐High b ‐Value and Time‐Dependent Diffusion Images of Brain Tissue’, NMR Biomed., vol. 38, no. 4, p. e70011, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1002/nbm.70011. [doi]
11. J.-D. Tournier, B. Jeurissen, and D. Christiaens, ‘Iterative Model-Based Rician Bias Correction and its Application to Denoising in Diffusion MRI’, in Proceedings 31. Annual Meeting International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Toronto, Canada, 2023, p. 3795. doi: https://doi.org/10.58530/2023/3795. [doi]
12. M. Froeling, C. M. W. Tax, S. B. Vos, P. R. Luijten, and A. Leemans, ‘“MASSIVE” brain dataset: Multiple acquisitions for standardization of structural imaging validation and evaluation’, Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 1797–1809, 2017, doi: 10.1002/mrm.26259. [doi]
Cite this abstract
http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/464-01-001