Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
352-01-006 / 352-01-006 ISMRM Abstract

Deep learning for subtractionless compressed-sensing whole-body MRA: a prospective analysis of interchangeability with CTA

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Image Reconstruction: AI
Secondary: Analysis Methods - Visualization
352-01-006 · New Methods: Acquisition and Reconstruction · Monday, 11 May, 8:20 AM–9:56 AM · Power Pitch Theatre 2
352-01-006 · New Methods: Acquisition and Reconstruction · Monday, 11 May, 8:20 AM–9:56 AM · Power Pitch Theatre 2
Keywords: Deep learning reconstruction 3T Whole-body MRA CT angiography Interchangeability
Accepted
Qing Fu 1, Xiang-chuang Kong1, Peng Sun2, Jing Peng3, Jiazheng Wang3, Lian Yang1, Zi-qiao Lei1, Chuan-sheng Zheng1
1Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
2Institute of Research and Clinical Innovations, Neusoft Medical Systems Co. Ltd, Shenyang, China
3Clinical and Technical Support, Philips Healthcare (Beijing), Beijing, China
Presenting Author: Qing Fu

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Jongbloets LMM, Koopman MMW, Büller HR, et al (1994) Limitations of compression ultrasound for the detection of symptomless postoperative deep vein thrombosis. The Lancet 343:1142–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90240-2 [doi]
2. Anderson JC, Baltaxe HA, Wolf GL (1979) Inability to show clot: one limitation of ultrasonography of the abdominal aorta. Radiology 132:693–696. https://doi.org/10.1148/132.3.693 [doi]
3. Parker PM, Vinocur CD, Smergel E, et al (1989) Intravenous digital subtraction angiography: its use in evaluating vascular injuries in children. J Pediatr Surg 24:423–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(89)80393-8 [doi]
4. van der Molen AJ, Dekkers IA, Geenen RWF, et al (2024) Waiting times between examinations with intravascularly administered contrast media: a review of contrast media pharmacokinetics and updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol 34:2512–2523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10085-5 [doi]
5. Wang G (2016) A Perspective on Deep Imaging. IEEE Access 4:8914–8924. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2624938 [doi]
6. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521:436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539 [doi]
7. Schlemper J, Caballero J, Hajnal JV, et al (2018) A Deep Cascade of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37:491–503. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2017.2760978 [doi]
8. Aggarwal HK, Mani MP, Jacob M (2019) MoDL: Model-Based Deep Learning Architecture for Inverse Problems. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 38:394–405. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2865356 [doi]
9. Ueda T, Ohno Y, Yamamoto K, et al (2022) Deep Learning Reconstruction of Diffusion-weighted MRI Improves Image Quality for Prostatic Imaging. Radiology 303:373–381. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.204097 [doi]
10. Johnson PM, Lin DJ, Zbontar J, et al (2023) Deep Learning Reconstruction Enables Prospectively Accelerated Clinical Knee MRI. Radiology 307:e220425. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.220425 [doi]
11. Xie Y, Tao H, Li X, et al (2024) Prospective Comparison of Standard and Deep Learning–reconstructed Turbo Spin-Echo MRI of the Shoulder. Radiology 310:e231405. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.231405 [doi]
12. Almansour H, Herrmann J, Gassenmaier S, et al (2023) Deep Learning Reconstruction for Accelerated Spine MRI: Prospective Analysis of Interchangeability. Radiology 306:e212922. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.212922 [doi]
13. Herrmann J, Gassenmaier S, Keller G, et al (2023) Deep Learning MRI Reconstruction for Accelerating Turbo Spin Echo Hand and Wrist Imaging: A Comparison of Image Quality, Visualization of Anatomy, and Detection of Common Pathologies with Standard Imaging. Academic Radiology 30:2606–2615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.12.042 [doi]
14. Altmann S, Grauhan NF, Brockstedt L, et al (2024) Ultrafast Brain MRI with Deep Learning Reconstruction for Suspected Acute Ischemic Stroke. Radiology 310:e231938. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.231938 [doi]
15. Fu Q, Lei Z, Li J, et al (2023) Subtractionless compressed-sensing-accelerated whole-body MR angiography using two-point Dixon fat suppression with single-pass half-reduced contrast dose: feasibility study and initial experience. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 25:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00953-w [doi]
16. Leiner T, Habets J, Versluis B, et al (2013) Subtractionless first-pass single contrast medium dose peripheral MR angiography using two-point Dixon fat suppression. Eur Radiol 23:2228–2235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2833-y [doi]
17. Nael K, Ruehm SG, Michaely HJ, et al (2007) Multistation Whole-Body High-Spatial-Resolution MR Angiography Using a 32-Channel MR System. American Journal of Roentgenology 188:529–539. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.2053 [doi]
18. Herborn CU, Goyen M, Quick HH, et al (2004) Whole-Body 3D MR Angiography of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease. American Journal of Roentgenology 182:1427–1434. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.6.1821427 [doi]
19. Goyen M, Herborn CU, Kröger K, et al (2003) Detection of Atherosclerosis: Systemic Imaging for Systemic Disease with Whole-Body Three-dimensional MR Angiography— Initial Experience. Radiology 227:277–282. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2271020488 [doi]
20. Harlianto NI (2024) Interrater Reliability Assessment of the Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System (BT-RADS). Radiol Imaging Cancer 6:e249016. https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.249016 [doi]
21. Benomar A, Zarour E, Létourneau-Guillon L, Raymond J (2023) Measuring Interrater Reliability. Radiology 309:e230492. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230492 [doi]
22. Obuchowski NA, Subhas N, Schoenhagen P (2014) Testing for interchangeability of imaging tests. Acad Radiol 21:1483–1489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.07.004 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/352-01-006