Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
568-02-009
ISMRM Abstract
Reduction of gradient wrap-around (cusp) artifacts in an insert gradient system by passive shim modification
Accepted
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
Log inReferences
1. M. Weiger et al., “A unipolar head gradient for high-field MRI without encoding ambiguity”, Magn Reason Med (2025, Early view), https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70098 [doi]
2. T. Chmielewski and S. M. Shvartsman, “Reduction of artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging” US Patent 11,353,535 B2 (2022).
3. Favazza et al, “Use of a radio frequency shield during 1.5 and 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging: experimental evaluation”, Medical Devices Evidence and Research 7:363-370 (2014)
4. K. King and R. S. Hinks, “Method and system of MR imaging with reduced FSE cusp artifacts”, US Patent 7,952,351 B2 (2011).
5. S. Chang et al., “Method and systems for coil selection in magnetic resonance imaging to reduce Annefact artifact”, US 2019/0369181 A1 (2019).
6. N. Rangwala and X. J. Zhou, “Reduction of FSE cusp artifact using a slice-tilting gradient”, Magn Reson Med 64(1), 220 (2010).
7. Y. Lai et al., “FSE cusp artifact removal using novel saturation method”, Proceedings of ISMRM (2015), Abstract 3779.
8. T.K.-F. Foo et al., “Highly efficient head-only magnetic field insert gradient coil for achieving simultaneous high gradient amplitude and slew rate at 3.0T (MAGNUS) for brain microstructure imaging”. Magn Reson Med 83(6), 2356 (2020).
Cite this abstract
http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/568-02-009