Keywords:Cardiovascular magnetic resonanceDeep Learning SegmentationHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionOral contraceptivesWomens cardiovascular health
Accepted
Angela Rocca 1, Jonas Richiardi2, Ruud B van Heeswijk2, Jaume Banus2, Costa Georgantas2, Philippe Meyer3, Ambra Masi1, Panagiotis Antiochos1, Henri Lu1, Juerg Schwitter1, Roger Hullin1
1Cardiovascular Department, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
2Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
3Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Geneva (HUG) and University of Geneva, Switzerland
Presenting Author: Angela Rocca
Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
1. Ho JE, Gona P, Pencina MJ, et al. Discriminating clinical features of heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in the community. European Heart Journal. 2012;33(14):1734-1741. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs070 [doi]
2. Kilfoil PJ, Lotteau S, Zhang R, et al. Distinct features of calcium handling and β‐adrenergic sensitivity in heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction. J Physiol. 2020;598(22):5091-5108. doi:10.1113/JP280425 [doi]
3. Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Borlaug BA, Rodeheffer RJ, Kass DA. Age- and Gender-Related Ventricular-Vascular Stiffening: A Community-Based Study. Circulation. 2005;112(15):2254-2262. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.541078 [doi]
4. Meyer P, Beale AL. Sex differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction therapy: Potential mechanisms and clinical implications. EMJ Cardiol. 2020;8:82-91.
5. Beale AL, Meyer P, Marwick TH, Lam CSP, Kaye DM. Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Pathophysiology: Why Women Are Overrepresented in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Circulation. 2018;138(2):198-205. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034271 [doi]
6. Meade TW, Greenberg G, Thompson SG. Progestogens and cardiovascular reactions associated with oral contraceptives and a comparison of the safety of 50- and 30-microgram oestrogen preparations. BMJ. 1980;280(6224):1157-1161. doi:10.1136/bmj.280.6224.1157 [doi]
7. WORLD FAMILY PLANNING: Meeting the Changing Needs for Family Planning. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATIO; 2022.
8. Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, et al. UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age. PLoS Med. 2015;12(3):e1001779. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 [doi]
9. Petersen SE, Matthews PM, Francis JM, et al. UK Biobank’s cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2016;18(1):8. doi:10.1186/s12968-016-0227-4 [doi]
10. Reddy YNV, Carter RE, Sundaram V, et al. An evidence-based screening tool for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFpEF-ABA score. Nat Med. 2024;30(8):2258-2264. doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03140-1 [doi]
11. Banus J, Ogier A, Hullin R, Meyer P, Van Heeswijk RB, Richiardi J. Deep Spatio-Temporal Multiplex Graph Learning for Cardiac Imaging Classification. In: ICASSP 2023 - 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE; 2023:1-5. doi:10.1109/ICASSP49357.2023.10096712 [doi]
12. Bai W, Sinclair M, Tarroni G, et al. Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance image analysis with fully convolutional networks. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2018;20(1):65. doi:10.1186/s12968-018-0471-x [doi]