Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
560-03-011 ISMRM Abstract

2D and 4D Flow CMR versus Ultrasonic Cardiography in Assessing Mitral Regurgitation Severity

Primary: Cardiovascular - Flow
Secondary: Contrast Mechanisms - Velocity/Flow
560-03-011 · Congenital Heart Disease, Valves, and Vessels · Wednesday, 13 May, 1:40 PM–2:35 PM · Digital Posters Row A
Keywords: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging 4D-flow MRI Mitral regurgitation
Accepted
taihui yu 1, wei wu2,3, jun shen4, maohuan lin5, Jun Peng6
1Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, China
2Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, China
3Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Panyu District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, guanghzou，guangdong, China
4Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, guangzhou，guangdong, China
5Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, guangzhou，guangdong, China
6Clinical and Technical Support, Philips Healthcare (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China
Presenting Author: taihui yu

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart E G, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J, 2003, 24(13): 1231-1243. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00201-x. [doi]
2. Lancellotti P, Pibarot P, Chambers J, et al. Multi-modality imaging assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an EACVI and ESC council of valvular heart disease position paper. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2022, 23(5): e171-e232. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab253. [doi]
3. Kitkungvan D, Nabi F, Kim RJ, Bonow RO, Khan MA, Xu J, et al. Myocardialfibrosis in patients with primary mitral regurgitation with and withoutprolapse. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2018) 72:823–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.048. [doi]
4. Uretsky S, Gillam L, Lang R, et al. Discordance between echocardiography and MRI in the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity: a prospective multicenter trial[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2015,65(11):1078-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.047. [doi]
5. Aplin M, Kyhl K, Bjerre J, et al. Cardiac remodelling and function with primary mitral valve insufficiency studied by magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016,17(8):863-870. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev321. Epub 2016 Jan 12. [doi]
6. Sachdev V, Hannoush H, Sidenko S, et al. Are Echocardiography and CMR Really Discordant in Mitral Regurgitation? [J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2017,10(7):823-824. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Nov 16. [doi]
7. Penicka M, Vecera J, Mirica D C, et al. Prognostic Implications of Magnetic Resonance-Derived Quantification in Asymptomatic Patients With Organic Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With Doppler Echocardiography-Derived Integrative Approach[J]. Circulation, 2018,137(13):1349-1360. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029332. [doi]
8. Spampinato R A, Jahnke C, Crelier G, et al. Quantification of regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse with four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2021,23(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00783-8. [doi]
9. Feneis J F, Kyubwa E, Atianzar K, et al. 4D flow MRI quantification of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation: Reproducibility and consistency relative to conventional MRI[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2018,48(4):1147-1158. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26040. [doi]
10. Jacobs K, Rigdon J, Chan F, et al. Direct measurement of atrioventricular valve regurgitant jets using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance is accurate and reliable for children with congenital heart disease: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2020,22(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00612-4. [doi]
11. Gupta A N, Avery R, Soulat G, et al. Direct mitral regurgitation quantification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using 4D flow CMR jet tracking: evaluation in comparison to conventional CMR[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2021,23(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00828-y. [doi]
12. Yosefy C, Levine R A, Solis J, et al. Proximal flow convergence region as assessed by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: challenging the hemispheric assumption[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2007,20(4):389-396. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.09.006. [doi]
13. Papolla C, Adda J, Rique A, et al. In Vitro Quantification of Mitral Regurgitation of Complex Geometry by the Modified Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area Method[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2020,33(7):838-847. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2020.03.008. [doi]
14. Gorodisky L, Agmon Y, Porat M, et al. Assessment of mitral regurgitation by 3-dimensional proximal flow convergence using magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with echo-Doppler[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2018,34(5):793-802. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1290-0. [doi]
15. Vincenti G, Masci P G, Rutz T, et al. Impact of bileaflet mitral valve prolapse on quantification of mitral regurgitation with cardiac magnetic resonance: a single-center study[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2017,19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0362-6. [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/560-03-011