Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
561-06-002 ISMRM Abstract

An Actively Tunable Metasurface for Image Enhancement at 7T

Primary: Physics & Engineering - New Devices
Secondary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Artifacts and Correction Strategies
561-06-002 · New and Novel Acquisition and Reconstruction · Wednesday, 13 May, 4:55 PM–5:50 PM · Digital Posters Row B
Keywords: Dynamic Imaging Metasurface
Accepted
Paul S Jacobs1, Gabor Mizsei2, Wyger Brink3,4, neil wilson1, Anshuman Swain1, John Detre1,5,6, Mark A Elliott 1, Ravinder Reddy1
1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States of America
2The Metabolic Discovery Center at Penn, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States of America
3Multi-Modality Medical Imaging (M3I), University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
4Multi-Modality Medical Imaging group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
5Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States of America
6Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States of America
Presenting Author: Mark A Elliott

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Kowal R, Knull L, Hubmann MJ, et al. Impact of MRI Field Strengths on Metasurface Enhancement. Ieee J Electromag Rf. Jun 2025;9(2):126-132. doi:10.1109/Jerm.2025.3548169 [doi]
2. Vorobyev V, Shchelokova A, Efimtcev A, et al. Improving B1+ homogeneity in abdominal imaging at 3 T with light, flexible, and compact metasurface. Magn Reson Med. Jan 2022;87(1):496-508. doi:10.1002/mrm.28946 [doi]
3. Dubois M, Leroi L, Raolison Z, et al. Kerker Effect in Ultrahigh-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Phys Rev X. Sep 27 2018;8(3)doi:ARTN 031083
4. Rotundo S, Lazzoni V, Dellabate A, Brizi D, Monorchio A. A Dual-Band Metasurface for Functional and Anatomical 1.5 T MRI. 2023:1117-1118.
5. Rotundo S, Lazzoni V, Dellabate A, Brizi D, Monorchio A. Dual-Tuned Magnetic Metasurface for Field Enhancement in 1H and 23Na 1.5 T MRI. Applied Sciences. 2025;15(11). doi:10.3390/app15115958 [doi]
6. Schmidt R, Webb A. Metamaterial Combining Electric- and Magnetic-Dipole-Based Configurations for Unique Dual-Band Signal Enhancement in Ultrahigh-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Acs Appl Mater Inter. Oct 11 2017;9(40):34618-34624. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b06949 [doi]
7. Jacobs PS, Wilson N, Brink W, et al. In vivo B1+ enhancement of calf MRI at 7 T via optimized flexible metasurfaces. Magn Reson Med. Mar 12 2024;doi:10.1002/mrm.30060 [doi]
8. Jacobs PS, Swain A, Wilson NE, et al. In Vivo Brain B(1) (+) Inhomogeneity Correction and NOE Image Enhancement at 7 T via Flexible Metasurfaces. NMR Biomed. May 2025;38(5):e70027. doi:10.1002/nbm.70027 [doi]
9. Jacobs PS, Brink WM, Narvekar P, et al. Reduction of radiofrequency induced implant heating via flexible metasurface shielding at 7 T. J Magn Reson. Jun 2 2025;377:107918. doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2025.107918 [doi]
10. Burov D, Seregin P, Shchelokova A, Koreshin E. Multi-mode metasurface as a receive coil for magnetic resonance imaging. Applied Physics Letters. 2023;122(26):261702. doi:10.1063/5.0152815 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/561-06-002