Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
570-03-183 ISMRM Abstract

Deep Learning-Augmented SENSE/GRAPPA Parallel Imaging for Enhanced Image Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy in Femoroacetabular

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - AI methods
Secondary: Musculoskeletal - Bone
570-03-183 · AI Methods · Wednesday, 13 May, 9:15 AM–10:10 AM · Traditional Posters | Exhibition Hall
Keywords: Parallel Imaging Deep learning reconstruction Image quality Diagnostic performance
Accepted
qi tong Liu 1, Chen Zhang2
1Department of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, beijing, China
2MR Research Collaboration, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Beijing, China
Presenting Author: qi tong Liu

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. [1] Palmer A, Fernquest S, Rombach I, et al. Medium-term results of arthroscopic hip surgery compared with physiotherapy and activity modification for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2025, 59(2):109-117.
2. [2] Agricola R, van Buuren MMA, Kemp JL, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in middle-aged individuals is strongly associated with the development of hip osteoarthritis within 10-year follow-up: a prospective cohort study (CHECK)[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2024, 58(18):1061-1067.
3. [3] Triana J, Shankar DS, Moore MA, et al. Significant systematic bias of alpha angles measured on MRI compared to various radiographic views in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2025, 33(3):1091-1103.
4. [4] Schmaranzer F, Meier MK, Sutter R. Femoroacetabular Impingement: Preoperative Planning and Postoperative MR Imaging Evaluation. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2025, 33(1):29-41.
5. [5] Tavakkoli M, Noseworthy MD. A Review on Accelerated Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques: Parallel Imaging, Compressed Sensing, and Machine Learning[J]. Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 2025, 53(5):71-85.
6. [6] Xiong F, Emrich T, Schoepf UJ, et al. Highly accelerated free-breathing real-time 2D flow imaging using compressed sensing and shared velocity encoding[J]. Eur Radiol, 2024, 34(3):1692-1703.
7. [7] Marth T, Marth AA, Kajdi GW, et al. Evaluating Undersampling Schemes and Deep Learning Reconstructions for High-Resolution 3D Double Echo Steady State Knee Imaging at 7 T: A Comparison Between GRAPPA, CAIPIRINHA, and Compressed Sensing[J]. Invest Radiol, 2025, 60(9):609-615.
8. [8] Demirel OB, Ghanbari F, Morales MA, et al. Accelerated cardiac cine with spatio-coil regularized deep learning reconstruction[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2025, 93(3):1132-1148.
9. [9] Montin E, Kijowski R, Youm T, et al. Radiomics features outperform standard radiological measurements in detecting femoroacetabular impingement on three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging[J]. J Orthop Res, 2024, 42(12):2796-2807.
10. [10] Takla A, O'Donnell J, Voight M, et al. The 2019 International Society of Hip Preservation (ISHA) physiotherapy agreement on assessment and treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS): an international consensus statement[J]. J Hip Preserv Surg, 2021, 7(4):631-642.
11. [11] Más Martínez J, Cuenca Copete A, Verdú Román C, et al. Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with 10-year minimum follow-up[J]. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol, 2024, 68(1):35-43.
12. [12] Lattanzi R. Methods for the Clinical Translation of Quantitative MRI for the Evaluation of Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement[J]. HSS J, 2023, 19(4):442-446.
13. [13] González-Pola R, Herrera-Lozano A, Graham-Nieto LF, et al. Deep learning applications in orthopaedics: a systematic review and future directions[J]. Acta Ortop Mex, 2025, 39(3):152-163.
14. [14] Hu SX, Xiao Y, Peng WL, et al. Accelerated 3D MR neurography of the brachial plexus using deep learning-constrained compressed sensing[J]. Eur Radiol, 2024, 34(2):842-851.
15. [15] Sahshong P, Chandra A, Mercado-Shekhar KP, et al. Deep denoising approach to improve shear wave phase velocity map reconstruction in ultrasound elastography[J]. Med Phys, 2025, 52(3):1481-1499.
16. [16] Tsukijima M, Teramoto A, Kojima A, et al. A position-adaptive noise-reduction method using a deep denoising filter bank for dedicated breast positron emission tomography images[J]. Phys Eng Sci Med, 2024, 47(1):73-85.
17. [17] Zhang L, Li Y, Liang Y, et al. Dilated multi-scale residual attention (DMRA) U-Net: three-dimensional (3D) dilated multi-scale residual attention U-Net for brain tumor segmentation[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2024, 14(10):7249-7264.
18. [18] Liu X, Wang R, Jiang W, et al. Automated Distal Radius and Ulna Skeletal Maturity Grading from Hand Radiographs with an Attention Multi-Task Learning Method[J]. Tomography, 2024, 10(12):1915-1929.

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/570-03-183