2022 Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB and ISMRT 31st Annual Meeting
7 May 2022 – 15 May 2022 · London, United Kingdom
4811 ISMRM Abstract

Improving the accessibility of deep learning-based denoising for MRI using transfer learning and self-supervised learning

4811 · Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence V · Thursday, 12 May, 2:45 PM–4:45 PM · Gather.town Space: North East  Room: 2
Accepted
Qiyuan Tian 1, Ziyu Li2, Wei-Ching Lo3, Berkin Bilgic1, Jonathan R Polimeni1, Susie Huang1
1Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
2Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
3Siemens Healthcare (United States), Malvern, United States of America
Presenting Author: Qiyuan Tian
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here.

This content is freely available and no longer restricted to registered attendees. Log in or create a free account to view it.

Log in

References

1. Tian Q, Zaretskaya N, Fan Q, et al. Improved cortical surface reconstruction using sub-millimeter resolution MPRAGE by image denoising. NeuroImage. 2021;233:117946.
2. Zhang K, Zuo W, Chen Y, Meng D, Zhang L. Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep cnn for image denoising. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2017;26(7):3142-3155.
3. Lehtinen J, Munkberg J, Hasselgren J, et al. Noise2Noise: Learning Image Restoration without Clean Data. The International Conference on Machine Learning. 2018:2965-2974.
4. Batson J, Royer L. Noise2self: Blind denoising by self-supervision. Paper presented at: International Conference on Machine Learning2019.
5. Krull A, Buchholz T-O, Jug F. Noise2void-learning denoising from single noisy images. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2019:2129-2137.
6. Quan Y, Chen M, Pang T, Ji H. Self2self with dropout: Learning self-supervised denoising from single image. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition2020.
7. Bilgic B, Gagoski BA, Cauley SF, et al. Wave‐CAIPI for highly accelerated 3D imaging. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2015;73(6):2152-2162.
8. Polak D, Cauley S, Huang SY, et al. Highly‐accelerated volumetric brain examination using optimized wave‐CAIPI encoding. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2019;50(3):961-974.
9. Polak D, Setsompop K, Cauley SF, et al. Wave‐CAIPI for highly accelerated MP‐RAGE imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2018;79(1):401-406.
10. Longo MGF, Conklin J, Cauley SF, et al. Evaluation of Ultrafast Wave-CAIPI MPRAGE for Visual Grading and Automated Measurement of Brain Tissue Volume. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2020;41(8):1388-1396.
11. Reuter M, Rosas HD, Fischl B. Highly accurate inverse consistent registration: a robust approach. NeuroImage. 2010;53(4):1181-1196.
12. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM. Cortical surface-based analysis: II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. NeuroImage. 1999;9(2):195-207.
13. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis: I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. NeuroImage. 1999;9(2):179-194.
14. Fischl B. FreeSurfer. NeuroImage. 2012;62(2):774-781.
15. Modat M, Ridgway GR, Taylor ZA, et al. Fast free-form deformation using graphics processing units. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2010;98(3):278-284.
16. Modat M, Cash DM, Daga P, Winston GP, Duncan JS, Ourselin S. Global image registration using a symmetric block-matching approach. Journal of Medical Imaging. 2014;1(2):024003-024003.
17. Glasser MF, Sotiropoulos SN, Wilson JA, et al. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. NeuroImage. 2013;80:105-124.
18. Glasser MF, Smith SM, Marcus DS, et al. The human connectome project's neuroimaging approach. Nature Neuroscience. 2016;19(9):1175-1187.
19. Falk T, Mai D, Bensch R, et al. U-Net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry. Nature Methods. 2019;16(1):67-70.
20. Dabov K, Foi A, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K. Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2007;16(8):2080-2095.
21. Maggioni M, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K, Foi A. Nonlocal transform-domain filter for volumetric data denoising and reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2012;22(1):119-133.
22. Coupé P, Yger P, Prima S, Hellier P, Kervrann C, Barillot C. An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for 3-D magnetic resonance images. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 2008;27(4):425-441.
23. Manjón JV, Coupé P, Martí‐Bonmatí L, Collins DL, Robles M. Adaptive non‐local means denoising of MR images with spatially varying noise levels. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2010;31(1):192-203.
24. Fischl B, Van Der Kouwe A, Destrieux C, et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex. 2004;14(1):11-22.
25. Reuter M, Schmansky NJ, Rosas HD, Fischl B. Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis. NeuroImage. 2012;61(4):1402-1418.
26. Reuter M, Fischl B. Avoiding asymmetry-induced bias in longitudinal image processing. NeuroImage. 2011;57(1):19-21.
27. Zaretskaya N, Fischl B, Reuter M, Renvall V, Polimeni JR. Advantages of cortical surface reconstruction using submillimeter 7 T MEMPRAGE. NeuroImage. 2018;165:11-26.

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2022/4811