Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
462-06-003 ISMRM Abstract

Standardizing Breast Diffusion MRI: An Anthropomorphic 2D Phantom for Quantitative and Reproducible ADC Measurements

Primary: Physics & Engineering - Phantoms
Secondary: Diffusion - Simulation/Validation
462-06-003 · Breast MRI: Technical Developments · Tuesday, 12 May, 4:55 PM–5:50 PM · Digital Posters Row C
Keywords: Diffusion MRI Diffusion phantom Breast dwi Standardization. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC)
Accepted
Todor Karaulanov1, Chamni Jayarathna1, Callie Weiant 1, John Wenzel1, Shannon John1, William Hollander1
1CaliberMRI, Boulder, United States of America
Presenting Author: Callie Weiant

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Gulani, V.; Seiberlich, N., Quantitative MRI: Rationale and Challenges. In Advances in Magnetic Resonance Technology and Applications, Seiberlich, N.; Gulani, V.; Calamante, F.; Campbell-Washburn, A.; Doneva, M.; Hu, H. H.; Sourbron, S., Eds. Academic Press: 2020; Vol. 1, pp xxxvii-li.
2. Keenan, K. E.; Biller, J. R.; Delfino, J. G.; Boss, M. A.; Does, M. D.; Evelhoch, J. L.; Griswold, M. A.; Gunter, J. L.; Hinks, R. S.; Hoffman, S. W.; Kim, G.; Lattanzi, R.; Li, X.; Marinelli, L.; Metzger, G. J.; Mukherjee, P.; Nordstrom, R. J.; Peskin, A. P.; Perez, E.; Russek, S. E.; Sahiner, B.; Serkova, N.; Shukla-Dave, A.; Steckner, M.; Stupic, K. F.; Wilmes, L. J.; Wu, H. H.; Zhang, H.; Jackson, E. F.; Sullivan, D. C., Recommendations towards standards for quantitative MRI (qMRI) and outstanding needs. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019, 49 (7), e26-e39.
3. Cashmore, M. T.; McCann, A. J.; Wastling, S. J.; McGrath, C.; Thornton, J.; Hall, M. G., Clinical quantitative MRI and the need for metrology. British Journal of Radiology 2021, 94 (1120), 20201215.
4. Granziera, C.; Wuerfel, J.; Barkhof, F.; Calabrese, M.; De Stefano, N.; Enzinger, C.; Evangelou, N.; Filippi, M.; Geurts, J. J. G.; Reich, D. S.; Rocca, M. A.; Ropele, S.; Rovira, À.; Sati, P.; Toosy, A. T.; Vrenken, H.; Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott, C. A. M.; Kappos, L., Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging towards clinical application in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2021, 144 (5), 1296-1311.
5. Carré, A.; Klausner, G.; Edjlali, M.; Lerousseau, M.; Briend-Diop, J.; Sun, R.; Ammari, S.; Reuzé, S.; Alvarez Andres, E.; Estienne, T.; Niyoteka, S.; Battistella, E.; Vakalopoulou, M.; Dhermain, F.; Paragios, N.; Deutsch, E.; Oppenheim, C.; Pallud, J.; Robert, C., Standardization of brain MR images across machines and protocols: bridging the gap for MRI-based radiomics. Sci Rep 2020, 10 (1), 12340.
6. Xin, H.; Frey, E. C.; Links, J. M.; Gilland, K. L.; Segars, W. P.; Tsui, B. M. W., A mathematical observer study for the evaluation and optimization of compensation methods for myocardial SPECT using a phantom population that realistically models patient variability. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 2004, 51 (1), 218-224.
7. Freed, M.; de Zwart, J. A.; Loud, J. T.; El Khouli, R. H.; Myers, K. J.; Greene, M. H.; Duyn, J. H.; Badano, A., An anthropomorphic phantom for quantitative evaluation of breast MRI. Med Phys 2011, 38 (2), 743-53.
8. Keenan, K. E.; Wilmes, L. J.; Aliu, S. O.; Newitt, D. C.; Jones, E. F.; Boss, M. A.; Stupic, K. F.; Russek, S. E.; Hylton, N. M., Design of a breast phantom for quantitative MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016, 44 (3), 610-9.
9. Martaindale, S. R., Breast MR Imaging: Atlas of Anatomy, Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems Lexicon. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2018, 26 (2), 179-190.
10. Santucci, D.; Faiella, E.; Calabrese, A.; Beomonte Zobel, B.; Ascione, A.; Cerbelli, B.; Iannello, G.; Soda, P.; de Felice, C., On the Additional Information Provided by 3T-MRI ADC in Predicting Tumor Cellularity and Microscopic Behavior. Cancers (Basel) 2021, 13 (20).
11. McDonald, E. S.; Schopp, J. G.; Peacock, S.; DeMartini, W. B.; Rahbar, H.; Lehman, C. D.; Partridge, S. C., Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Association Between Patient Characteristics and Apparent Diffusion Coefficients of Normal Breast Fibroglandular Tissue at 3 T. American Journal of Roentgenology 2014, 202 (5), W496-W502.
12. Boss, M. A.; Malyarenko, D.; Partridge, S.; Obuchowski, N.; Shukla-Dave, A.; Winfield, J. M.; Fuller, C. D.; Miller, K.; Mishra, V.; Ohliger, M.; Wilmes, L. J.; Attariwala, R.; Andrews, T.; deSouza, N. M.; Margolis, D. J.; Chenevert, T. L., The QIBA Profile for Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker. Radiology 2024, 313 (1), e233055.

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/462-06-003