Veronika Ecker 1,2, Elisa Marchetto3,4, Hannah Eichhorn5,6, Melanie Ganz7,8, Sergios Gatidis1,9, Bin Yang2, Thomas Küstner1
1Medical Image and Data Analysis (MIDAS.lab), Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
2Institute of Signal Processing and System Theory, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
3Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Dept. of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, United States of America
4Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Dept. of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, United States of America
5Institute of Machine Learning in Biomedical Imaging, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany
6School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
7Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
8Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
9Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States of America
Presenting Author: Veronika Ecker
Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
1. Wood and Henkelman. MR image artifacts from periodic motion. Med Phys. 12(2):143-51, 1985.
2. Smith. MRI artifacts and correction strategies. Imaging in Medicine; London Bd. 2, Ausg. 4, 445-457, 2010.
3. Zaitsev et al. Motion artifacts in MRI: A complex problem with many partial solutions, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 887–901, 2015.
4. Küstner et al. Retrospective correction of motion-affected MR images using deep learning frameworks. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 82(4):1527-1540, 2019.
5. Levac et al. Accelerated Motion Correction for MRI Using Score-Based Generative Models. 2023 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Cartagena, Colombia, pp. 1-5, 2023.
6. Lee et al. MC2-Net: motion correction network for multi-contrast brain MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 86(2):1077-1092, 2021.
7. Rizzuti et al. Joint Retrospective Motion Correction and Reconstruction for Brain MRI With a Reference Contrast. in IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 8, pp. 490-504, 2022.
8. Hossbach et al. Deep learning-based motion quantification from k-space for fast model-based magnetic resonance imaging motion correction. Med Phys. 50(4):2148-2161, 2023.
9. Lee et al. MC2-Net: motion correction network for multi-contrast brain MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 86(2):1077-1092, 2023.
10. Wang et al. Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on. 13. 600 - 612. 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861, 2004. [doi]
11. Sheikh and Bovik. Image information and visual quality. IEEE Trans Image Process. 15(2):430-44, 2006.
12. Zhang et al. FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment. In IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society 20 (8), pp. 2378–2386, 2011.
13. Aksoy et al. Hybrid prospective and retrospective head motion correction to mitigate cross-calibration errors. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 67(5), 1237–1251, 2012.
14. Krotkov. Focusing. Int J Comput Vision 1, 223–237, 1988.
15. Marchetto et al. Agreement of image quality metrics with radiological evaluation in the presence of motion artifacts. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 1-12, 2025.
16. Ganz M. and Eichhorn H.Datasets with and without deliberate head movements for evaluating the performance of markerless prospective motion correction and selective reacquisition in a general clinical protocol for brain MRI, OpenNeuro doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004332.v1.0.0, 2024. [doi]
17. Sudlow et al. UK Biobank: An open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. Publisher: Public Library of Science. vol. 12, no. 3, p. e1001779, 2015.
18. Küstner et al. Self-supervised contrastive learning for motion artifact detection in whole-body MRI. Quality assessment across multiple cohorts. ISMRM. 2023.
19. Cao et al. Swin-unet: Unet-like pure transformer for medical image segmentation. ECCV, 2022.
20. Hadsell et al. Dimensionality Reduction by Learning an Invariant Mapping. 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06), New York, NY, USA, pp. 1735-1742, 2006.
21. Iglesias et al. Robust Brain Extraction Across Datasets and Comparison With Publicly Available Methods. in IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1617-1634, 2011.