Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
465-03-007
ISMRM Abstract
Comparison of Three-Dimensional Sequences in Brachial Plexus Magnetic Resonance Neurography
Accepted
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
Log inReferences
1. Chhabra A, Andreisek G, Soldatos T, et al.: MR neurography: past, present, and future. Ajr Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197:583–91.
2. Sneag DB, Daniels SP, Geannette C, et al.: Post-Contrast 3D Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Neurography for Evaluation of Branch Nerves of the Brachial Plexus. Eur J Radiol 2020; 132:109304.
3. Smith RC, Constable RT, Reinhold C, McCauley T, Lange RC, McCarthy S: Fast Spin Echo STIR Imaging. J Comput Assist Tomo 1994; 18:209–213.
4. Delaney H, Bencardino J, Rosenberg ZS: Magnetic Resonance Neurography of the Pelvis and Lumbosacral Plexus. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 2014; 24:127–150.
5. Bruder H, Fischer H, Graumann R, Deimling M: A new steady‐state imaging sequence for simultaneous acquisition of two MR images with clearly different contrasts. Magn Reson Med 1988; 7:35–42.
6. Hu S, Li Y, Hou B, et al.: Multi-echo in steady-state acquisition improves MRI image quality and lumbosacral radiculopathy diagnosis efficacy compared with T2 fast spin-echo sequence. Neuroradiology 2023; 65:969–977.
7. Pan X, Wen Y, Huang K, et al.: Application of three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) Multi-Echo iN Steady-state Acquisition sequences in preoperative evaluation of lumbar disc herniation: a prospective study. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2024; 0:0–0.
8. Pitman J, Lin Y, Tan ET, Sneag D: Magnetic Resonance Neurography of the Lumbosacral Plexus. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:229–245.
9. Grande FD, Santini F, Herzka DA, et al.: Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiographics Rev Publ Radiological Soc North Am Inc 2014; 34:217–33.
10. Lin Y, Tan ET, Campbell G, et al.: Improved 3D DESS MR neurography of the lumbosacral plexus with deep learning and geometric image combination reconstruction. Skelet Radiol 2024; 53:1529–1539.
11. Sun S, Tan ET, Mintz DN, et al.: Evaluation of deep learning reconstructed high-resolution 3D lumbar spine MRI. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:6167–6177.
12. Wang R, Zhu D, Han Z, Ding J: The Application of Customized Rice Bags in 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Neck Scanning with Fat Suppression Pulse Sequences. J Méd Imaging Heal Inform 2019; 9:764–767.
13. Cicchetti DV: Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. Psychol Assess 1994; 6:284–290.
14. McHugh ML: Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med 2012; 22:276–282.
15. Sneag DB, Queler SC, Campbell G, et al.: Optimized 3D brachial plexus MR neurography using deep learning reconstruction. Skelet Radiol 2024; 53:779–789.
16. Davidson EJ, Tan ET, Sneag DB: Magnetic resonance neurography in the diagnosis of neurological subtypes of thoracic outlet syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2024; 70:1128–1139.
17. Zaitsev M, Maclaren J, Herbst M: Motion artifacts in MRI: A complex problem with many partial solutions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 42:887–901.
Cite this abstract
http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/465-03-007