Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026
· Cape Town, South Africa
501-03-007
ISMRM Abstract
Fourier domain fMRI analysis for robustness to hemodynamic response function heterogeneity
Primary:
Brain Function and fMRI - fMRI Analysis
Secondary:
Brain Function and fMRI - Task/Intervention Based fMRI
501-03-007 · fMRI: Advanced Analysis
· Wednesday, 13 May, 1:40 PM–3:30 PM · Hall 1A
Keywords:Functional MRIGeneral linear modelFourier domainHRF variabilityMagnitude processing
Accepted
Seon-Ha Hwang1, HyeRyeong Choi 1, Sung-Hong Park1
1Department of Bio and brain engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
Presenting Author: HyeRyeong Choi
Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
1. Lindquist, M.A., Loh, J.M., Atlas, L.Y., Wager, T.D., 2009. Modeling the hemodynamic response function in fMRI: efficiency, bias and mis-modeling. Neuroimage 45, S187-S198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.065 [doi]
2. Handwerker, D.A., Ollinger, J.M., D'Esposito, M., 2004. Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses. Neuroimage 21, 1639-1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.029 [doi]
3. Rangaprakash, D., Dretsch, M.N., Yan, W., Katz, J.S., Denney Jr, T.S., Deshpande, G., 2017. Hemodynamic variability in soldiers with trauma: implications for functional MRI connectivity studies. NeuroImage: Clinical 16, 409-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.07.016 [doi]
4. Friston, K.J., Fletcher, P., Josephs, O., Holmes, A., Rugg, M., Turner, R., 1998. Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses. Neuroimage 7, 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1997.0306 [doi]
5. Rio, D.E., Rawlings, R.R., Woltz, L.A., Salloum, J.B., Hommer, D.W., 2006. Single subject image analysis using the complex general linear model—an application to functional magnetic resonance imaging with multiple inputs. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 82, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.12.003 [doi]
6. Calhoun, V.D., Adali, T., Pekar, J.J., Pearlson, G.D., 2003. Latency (in) sensitive ICA: group independent component analysis of fMRI data in the temporal frequency domain. Neuroimage 20, 1661-1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00411-7 [doi]
7. Calhoun, V.D., Adali, T., McGinty, V.B., Pekar, J.J., Watson, T.D., Pearlson, G.D., 2001. fMRI activation in a visual-perception task: network of areas detected using the general linear model and independent components analysis. Neuroimage 14, 1080-1088. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0921 [doi]
8. Sundararajan, D., 2001. The discrete Fourier transform: theory, algorithms and applications. World Scientific.
10. Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., Smith, S., 2002. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17, 825-841. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 [doi]
11. Bosch, V., 2000. Statistical analysis of multi‐subject fMRI data: Assessment of focal activations. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 11, 61-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(200001)11:1<61::AID-JMRI9>3.0.CO;2-C [doi]
12. Swisher, J.D., Halko, M.A., Merabet, L.B., McMains, S.A., Somers, D.C., 2007. Visual topography of human intraparietal sulcus. Journal of Neuroscience 27, 5326-5337. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0991-07.2007 [doi]
13. Bressler, D., Spotswood, N., Whitney, D., 2007. Negative BOLD fMRI response in the visual cortex carries precise stimulus-specific information. PloS one 2, e410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000410 [doi]
14. Taube, J.S., 2007. The head direction signal: origins and sensory-motor integration. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 181-207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112854 [doi]
15. Asan, A.S., McIntosh, J.R., Carmel, J.B., 2022. Targeting sensory and motor integration for recovery of movement after CNS injury. Frontiers in Neuroscience 15, 791824. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.791824 [doi]