Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
563-02-010 ISMRM Abstract

HRDNet: Hybrid ResNeXt–Dense Network for Quantitative T1ρ Mapping from Undersampled k-Space

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Quantitative Imaging: relaxometry, multi-parametric, MR Fingerprinting, and synthetic MRI
Secondary: Musculoskeletal - Cartilage
563-02-010 · Cartilage 2026 · Wednesday, 13 May, 9:15 AM–10:10 AM · Digital Posters Row D
Keywords: Deep learning reconstruction Quantitative MRI K-Space Deep Learning Quantitative Mapping Mono-exponential Maps
Accepted
Dilbag Singh 1,2, Ravinder R Regatte1,2, Marcelo V Zibetti1,2
1The Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, United States of America
2The Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, United States of America
Presenting Author: Dilbag Singh

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. 1. Granziera, C., Wuerfel, J., Barkhof, F., Calabrese, M., De Stefano, N., Enzinger, C., Evangelou, N., Filippi, M., Geurts, J. J. G., Reich, D. S., Rocca, M. A., Ropele, S., Rovira, À., Sati, P., Toosy, A. T., Vrenken, H., Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott, C. A. M., Kappos, L., & MAGNIMS Study Group (2021). Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging towards clinical application in multiple sclerosis. Brain : a journal of neurology, 144(5), 1296–1311. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab029 [doi]
2. 2. Serai, S. D. (2022). Basics of magnetic resonance imaging and quantitative parameters T1, T2, T2*, T1rho and diffusion-weighted imaging. Pediatric Radiology, 52(2), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05042-7 [doi]
3. 3. de Mello, R., Ma, Y., Ji, Y., Du, J., & Chang, E. Y. (2019). Quantitative MRI musculoskeletal techniques: An update. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 213(3), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.21143 [doi]
4. 4. Gilani, I. A., & Sepponen, R. (2016). Quantitative rotating frame relaxometry methods in MRI. NMR in Biomedicine, 29(6), 841-861. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3518 [doi]
5. 5. Banjar, M., Horiuchi, S., Gedeon, D. N., & Yoshioka, H. (2022). Review of quantitative knee articular cartilage MR imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, 21(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0052 [doi]
6. 6. Regatte, R. R., Akella, S. V., Lonner, J. H., Kneeland, J. B., & Reddy, R. (2006). $T_{1\rho}$ relaxation mapping in human osteoarthritis (OA) cartilage: comparison of $T_{1\rho}$ with T2. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 23(4), 547–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20536 [doi]
7. 7. Nozaki, T., Kaneko, Y., Yu, H. J., Kaneshiro, K., Schwarzkopf, R., Hara, T., & Yoshioka, H. (2016). T1rho mapping of entire femoral cartilage using depth- and angle-dependent analysis. European Radiology, 26(6), 1952–1962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3988-5 [doi]
8. 8. Wáng, Y. X. J., Zhang, Q., Li, X., Chen, W., Ahuja, A., & Yuan, J. (2015). $T_{1\rho}$ magnetic resonance: basic physics principles and applications in knee and intervertebral disc imaging. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 5(6), 858. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2015.12.06 [doi]
9. 9. Hanhela, M., Paajanen, A., Nissi, M. J., & Kolehmainen, V. (2022). Embedded quantitative MRI $T_{1\rho}$ mapping using non-linear primal-dual proximal splitting. Journal of Imaging, 8(6), 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8060157 [doi]
10. 10. Madsen, K., Nielsen, H. B., & Tingleff, O. (2004). Methods for non-linear least squares problems, 2nd ed. Lyngby, Denmark: Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, 2004.
11. 11. Steihaug, T. (1983). The conjugate gradient method and trust regions in large scale optimization. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 20(3), 626-637. https://doi.org/10.1137/0720042 [doi]
12. 12. Hwang, D., & Du, Y. P. (2009). Improved myelin water quantification using spatially regularized non‐negative least squares algorithm. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 30(1), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21783 [doi]
13. 13. Fenrich, F. R. E., Beaulieu, C., & Allen, P. S. (2001). Relaxation times and microstructures. NMR in Biomedicine, 14(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.685 [doi]
14. 14. Zibetti, M. V. W., Helou, E. S., Sharafi, A., & Regatte, R. R. (2020). Fast multicomponent 3D‐$T_{1\rho}$ relaxometry. NMR in Biomedicine, 33(12), e4318. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4318 [doi]
15. 15. Eriksson, J. (1996). Optimization and regularization of nonlinear least squares problems. Jerusalem: Verlag nicht ermittelbar.
16. 16. Liu, F., Feng, L., & Kijowski, R. (2019). MANTIS: model‐augmented neural network with incoherent k‐space sampling for efficient MR parameter mapping. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 82(1), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27707 [doi]
17. 17. Li, H., Yang, M., Kim, J. H., et al. (2023). SuperMAP: Deep ultrafast MR relaxometry with joint spatiotemporal undersampling. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29411 [doi]
18. 18. Li, X., Han, E. T., Busse, R. F., & Majumdar, S. (2008). In vivo $T_{1\rho}$ mapping in cartilage using 3D magnetization-prepared angle-modulated partitioned k-space spoiled gradient echo snapshots (3D MAPSS). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 59(2), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21414 [doi]
19. 19. Zibetti, M. V. W., Sharafi, A., & Regatte, R. R. (2022). Optimization of spin‐lock times in $T_{1\rho}$ mapping of knee cartilage: Cramér‐Rao bounds versus matched sampling‐fitting. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 87(3), 1418–1434. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29063 [doi]
20. 20. Levine, E., Daniel, B., Vasanawala, S., Hargreaves, B., & Saranathan, M. (2017). 3D Cartesian MRI with compressed sensing and variable view sharing using complementary poisson‐disc sampling. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 77(5), 1774-1785. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26254 [doi]
21. 21. Zibetti, M. V. W., Knoll, F., & Regatte, R. R. (2022). Alternating learning approach for variational networks and undersampling pattern in parallel MRI applications. IEEE transactions on computational imaging, 8, 449-461. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCI.2022.3176129 [doi]
22. 22. Uecker, M., Lai, P., Murphy, M. J., Virtue, P., Elad, M., Pauly, J. M., et al. (2014). ESPIRiT—an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 71(3), 990-1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24751 [doi]
23. 23. Singh, D., Regatte, R. R., & Zibetti, M. V. (2024). HDNLS: Hybrid deep-learning and non-linear least squares-based method for fast multi-component $T_{1\rho}$ mapping in the knee joint. Bioengineering, 12(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12010008 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/563-02-010