451-02-004 · Advances in Contrast Mechanisms
· Tuesday, 12 May, 1:40 PM–3:16 PM · Power Pitch Theatre 1
451-02-004 · Advances in Contrast Mechanisms
· Tuesday, 12 May, 1:40 PM–3:16 PM · Power Pitch Theatre 1
Keywords:JointsBoneUltra-short Echo Time (UTE)CT-like MRIMR arthrography
Accepted
Badr Sellami1, Hubert Raeymaekers 1, Stefan Sommer2,3, Thomas Janssens4, Vincent Denolin4, PETER VAN SCHUERBEEK1,5,6, Maarten Naeyaert1,5, Mimoun Kichouh1, Manon Roose1,7,8
1Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
2Swiss Center for Musculoskeletal Imaging (SCMI), Zurich, Switzerland
3Swiss Innovation Hub, Siemens Healthineers International AG, Switzerland
4Siemens Healthineers NV/SA Belgium, Belgium
5Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
8Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Presenting Author: Hubert Raeymaekers
Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
1. 1. Mateusz C. Florkow, MSc, Koen Willemsen, MD, Vasco V. Mascarenhas, MD, PhD,Edwin H.G. Oei, MD, PhD, Marijn van Stralen, PhD, and Peter R. Seevinck, PhD,“Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Three-Dimensional Bone Imaging of Musculoskeletal Pathologies: A Review", J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2022;56:11–34. PMID: 35044717 PMCID: PMC9305220 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28067 [doi][pmid]
2. 2. Ma YJ, West J, Nazaran A, Cheng X, Hoenecke H, Du J, Chang EY. Feasibility of using an inversion-recovery ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence for quantification of glenoid bone loss. Skeletal Radiol. 2018 Jul;47(7):973-980. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-2898-4. Epub 2018 Feb 2. PMID: 29396694; PMCID: PMC5960612. [doi][pmid]
3. 3. Emanuela Mendes Junqueira de Barros, Renata Vidal Leão, Sarah Verdan3, Marília da Cruz Fagundes, Bruno Murad, Gustavo da Fonseca Monjardim, Thiago de Gautier Oliveira do Amarante de Paulo, Stephan Altmayer, Giovanni Brondani Torri, “MRI versus CT for glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta‑analysis, Skeletal Radiology, 15 sep 2025, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-025-05029-7 [doi]
4. 4. Zhenzhou Wu, William Zaylor, Stefan Sommer, Dongxing Xie, Xiaodong Zhong, Kecheng Liu, Jeehun Kim, Jillian E Beveridge, Xiaoliang Zhang, Xiaojuan Li, “ “Assessment of ultrashort echo time (UTE) T2* mapping at 3T for the whole knee: repeatability, the effects of fat suppression, and knee position”, Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2023 Nov 22;13(12):7893-7909, doi: 10.21037/qims-23-459 [doi]