2022 Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB and ISMRT 31st Annual Meeting
7 May 2022 – 15 May 2022 · London, United Kingdom
3446 ISMRM Abstract

3D-CAIPI-BUDA and Joint Hankel Low-Rank Reconstruction Enable Rapid and Distortion-free High-Resolution T2* Mapping and QSM

3446 · Novel Image Reconstruction Techniques II · Monday, 9 May, 5:00 PM–7:00 PM · Gather.town Space: North East  Room: 3
Accepted
Zhifeng Chen 1,2,3, Congyu Liao4, Xiaozhi Cao4, Benedikt A Poser5, zhongbiao xu6, Wei‐Ching Lo7, Manyi Wen8, Jaejin Cho1, Qiyuan Tian1, Yaohui Wang9, Yanqiu Feng3, Wufan Chen3, Ling Xia10, Feng Liu11, Berkin Bilgic1,2
1Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America
2Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
3School of Biomedical Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
4Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States of America
5Maastricht Brain Imaging Center, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
6Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangzhou, China
7Siemens Healthcare (United States), Malvern, United States of America
8Department of Chemical Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
9Division of Superconducting Magnet Science and Technology, Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
10Department of Biomedical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
11School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Presenting Author: Zhifeng Chen
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here.

This content is freely available and no longer restricted to registered attendees. Log in or create a free account to view it.

Log in

References

1. Gracien RM, Maiworm M, Brüche N, et al. How stable is quantitative MRI? – Assessment of intra- and inter-scanner-model reproducibility using identical acquisition sequences and data analysis programs. Neuroimage . 2020;207(August 2019):1-11.
2. van Wijnen A, Petrov F, Maiworm M, et al. Cortical quantitative MRI parameters are related to the cognitive status in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Eur Radiol . 2020;30(2):1045-1053.
3. Larsen B, Olafsson V, Calabro F, et al. Maturation of the human striatal dopamine system revealed by PET and quantitative MRI. Nat Commun . 2020;11(1):1-10.
4. Bandettini PA. Twenty years of functional MRI: The science and the stories. Neuroimage . 2012;62(2):575-588.
5. Liao C, Cao X, Cho J, Zhang Z, Setsompop K, Bilgic B. Highly efficient MRI through multi-shot echo planar imaging. 2019;1113818(September 2019):43.
6. Cao X, Wang K, Liao C, et al. Efficient T2 mapping with blip-up/down EPI and gSlider-SMS (T2-BUDA-gSlider). Magn Reson Med . 2021;86(4):2064-2075.
7. Dierkes T, Neeb H, Shah NJ. Distortion correction in echo-planar imaging and quantitative T2* mapping. Int Congr Ser . 2004;1265(C):181-185.
8. Langkammer C, Bredies K, Poser BA, et al. Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping using 3D EPI and total generalized variation. Neuroimage . 2015;111:622-630.
9. Ardekani S, Sinha U. Geometric distortion correction of high-resolution 3 T diffusion tensor brain images. Magn Reson Med . 2005;54(5):1163-1171.
10. Chen N kuei, Guidon A, Chang HC, Song AW. A robust multi-shot scan strategy for high-resolution diffusion weighted MRI enabled by multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE). Neuroimage . 2013;72:41-47.
11. Jeong HK, Gore JC, Anderson AW. High-resolution human diffusion tensor imaging using 2-D navigated multishot SENSE EPI at 7 T. Magn Reson Med . 2013;69(3):793-802.
12. Mani M, Jacob M, Kelley D, Magnotta V. Multi-shot sensitivity-encoded diffusion data recovery using structured low-rank matrix completion (MUSSELS). Magn Reson Med . 2017;78(2):494-507.
13. Bilgic B, Poser B, Langkammer, Christian Setsompop K, Liao C. 3D-BUDA Enables Rapid Distortion-Free QSM Acquisition. Proc 28th Annu Meet ISMRM . 2020;virtual meeting:596.
14. Breuer FA, Blaimer M, Heidemann RM, Mueller MF, Griswold MA, Jakob PM. Controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA) for multi-slice imaging. Magn Reson Med . 2005;53(3):684-691.
15. Setsompop K, Gagoski BA, Polimeni JR, Witzel T, Wedeen VJ, Wald LL. Blipped-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g-factor penalty. Magn Reson Med . 2012;67(5):1210-1224.
16. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. FSL. Neuroimage . 2012;62:782-790.
17. Jin KH, Lee D, Ye JC. A General Framework for Compressed Sensing and Parallel MRI Using Annihilating Filter Based Low-Rank Hankel Matrix. IEEE Trans Comput Imaging . 2016;2(4):480-495.
18. Mani M, Jacob M, McKinnon G, et al. SMS MUSSELS: A navigator-free reconstruction for simultaneous multi-slice-accelerated multi-shot diffusion weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med . 2020;83(1):154-169.
19. Samsonov AA, Kholmovski EG, Parker DL, Johnson CR. POCSENSE: POCS-based reconstruction for sensitivity encoded magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med . 2004;52(6):1397-1406.
20. Ma D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N, et al. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature . 2013;495(7440):187-192.
21. Polak D, Chatnuntawech I, Yoon J, et al. Nonlinear dipole inversion (NDI) enables robust quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). NMR Biomed . 2020;33(12):1-13.
22. Milovic C, Shmueli K. Automatic , Non-Regularized Nonlinear Dipole Inversion for Fast and Robust Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping. Proc 29th Annu Meet ISMRM, virtual Meeting . Published online 2021:3982.
23. D. G. ALTMAN, J. M. BLAND. Measurement in Medicine: the Analysis of Method Comparison Studies. Stat . 1983;32(7):307-317.
24. Li W, Wu B, Liu C. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. Neuroimage . 2011;55(4):1645-1656.
25. Wu B, Li W, Guidon A, Liu C. Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med . 2012;67(1):137-147.
26. Schweser F, Sommer K, Deistung A, Reichenbach JR. Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain. Neuroimage . 2012;62(3):2083-2100.
27. Liu T, Spincemaille P, De Rochefort L, Kressler B, Wang Y. Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): A method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI. Magn Reson Med . 2009;61(1):196-204.

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2022/3446