Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
665-01-002 ISMRM Abstract

Track-weighted Dynamic Functional Connectivity Unravels the Structural-Functional Coupling in Treated Glioma Survivors

Accepted
Joppe Van Rumst 1,2, Rob Colaes2,3,4, Laurien De Roeck1, Charlotte Sleurs1,5, Sabine Deprez2,3,4, Daan Christiaens3,6, Stefan Sunaert2,3,7,8, Maarten Lambrecht1,9, Ahmed M Radwan2,3,10
1Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
3Department of Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
4Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
5Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
6Department of Electrical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
7Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
8Department of Radiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
9Department of Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
10Medical Imaging Research Center, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Presenting Author: Joppe Van Rumst

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. L. De Roeck et al., “Increased functional network segregation in glioma patients posttherapy: A neurological compensatory response or catastrophe for cognition?,” Network Neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 743–760, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1162/NETN_A_00449. [doi]
2. L. De Roeck et al., “Structural Network Hubs as Potential Organs at Risk in Glioma Patients After Radiation Therapy,” Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 631–642, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.019. [doi]
3. F. Calamante, R. E. Smith, X. Liang, A. Zalesky, and A. Connelly, “Track-weighted dynamic functional connectivity (TW-dFC): a new method to study time-resolved functional connectivity,” Brain Struct Funct, vol. 222, no. 8, pp. 3761–3774, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00429-017-1431-1. [doi]
4. C. Andrade, “Z Scores, Standard Scores, and Composite Test Scores Explained,” Indian J Psychol Med, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 555–557, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1177/02537176211046525. [doi]
5. S. J. M. Rijnen et al., “Evaluation of Normative Data of a Widely Used Computerized Neuropsychological Battery: Applicability and Effects of Sociodemographic Variables in a Dutch Sample,” Assessment, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 373, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1073191117727346. [doi]
6. J. D. Tournier et al., “MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation,” Neuroimage, vol. 202, p. 116137, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2019.116137. [doi]
7. M. Jenkinson, C. F. Beckmann, T. E. J. Behrens, M. W. Woolrich, and S. M. Smith, “FSL,” Neuroimage, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 782–790, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2011.09.015. [doi]
8. O. Esteban et al., “fMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI,” Nat Methods, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 111–116, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1038/S41592-018-0235-4;SUBJMETA. [doi]
9. S. Whitfield-Gabrieli and A. Nieto-Castanon, “Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks,” Brain Connect, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 125–141, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1089/BRAIN.2012.0073. [doi]
10. P. N. Wang et al., “Callosal degeneration topographically correlated with cognitive function in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and alzheimer’s disease dementia,” Hum Brain Mapp, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 1529, 2013, doi: 10.1002/HBM.22271. [doi]
11. F. Calamante et al., “Track-weighted functional connectivity (TW-FC): A tool for characterizing the structural–functional connections in the brain,” Neuroimage, vol. 70, pp. 199–210, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2012.12.054. [doi]

Cite this abstract