Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
568-05-015 ISMRM Abstract

Iterative Spatial-smoothness Constrained Field-inhomogeneity Correction for Deep Learning-based Fat-Water Quantification

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Image Reconstruction: AI
Secondary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Quantitative Imaging: chest, abdomen, and pelvis
568-05-015 · Image Reconstruction I · Wednesday, 13 May, 4:00 PM–4:55 PM · Digital Posters Row I
Keywords: Fat and Fat/Water Separation Quantitative MRI Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) B0 Inhomogeneity Field mapping
Accepted
Moorthy Ganeshkumar1, Devasenathipathy Kandasamy2, Amit Mehndiratta1,3,4
1Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
2Department of Radio Diagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
3Yardi School of Artificial Intelligence, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
4The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Presenting Author: Priyanka Bhat

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. G. M. Kukuk et al., “Comparison between modified Dixon MRI techniques, MR spectroscopic relaxometry, and different histologic quantification methods in the assessment of hepatic steatosis,” Eur. Radiol., vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2869–2879, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3703-6. [doi]
2. W. Bian, A. Jang, and F. Liu, “Improving quantitative MRI using self‐supervised deep learning with model reinforcement: Demonstration for rapid T1 mapping,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 98–111, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1002/mrm.30045. [doi]
3. J. W. Goldfarb, J. Craft, and J. J. Cao, “Water-fat separation and parameter mapping in cardiac MRI via deep learning with a convolutional neural network: MR Water-Fat Separation,” J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 655–665, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1002/jmri.26658. [doi]
4. R. Jafari et al., “Deep neural network for water/fat separation: Supervised training, unsupervised training, and no training,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 2263–2277, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1002/mrm.28546. [doi]
5. M. Ganeshkumar, D. Kandasamy, R. Sharma, and A. Mehndiratta, “Fat–water MRI separation using deep complex convolution network,” Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. Biol. Med., Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10334-025-01268-w. [doi]
6. Kayal, E.B., Kandasamy, D., Khare, K., Alampally, J.T., Bakhshi, S., Sharma, R. and Mehndiratta, A., 2017. Quantitative analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion MRI using total variation and huber penalty function. Medical physics, 44(11), pp.5849-5858.
7. H. Yu, S. B. Reeder, A. Shimakawa, J. H. Brittain, and N. J. Pelc, “Field map estimation with a region growing scheme for iterative 3-point water-fat decomposition,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1032–1039, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1002/mrm.20654. [doi]
8. D. Hernando, P. Kellman, J. P. Haldar, and Z.-P. Liang, “Robust water/fat separation in the presence of large field inhomogeneities using a graph cut algorithm,” Magn. Reson. Med., p. NA-NA, 2009, doi: 10.1002/mrm.22177. [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/568-05-015