Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
568-04-002 ISMRM Abstract

Optimal Selection of the Effective TE for T2-weighted Fast-Spin-Echo MRI of the Prostate at 3T: Effect on Lesion Conspicuity

Accepted
Dahan Kim 1, Ronard Pabi2, Eric Borisch1, Adam Froemming1, Roger Grimm1, Sara Hassanzadeh1, Akira Kawashima3, Ayumu Kido1, Naoki Takahashi1, John V Thomas1, Stephen J Riederer1
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States of America
2Department of Physics, Gustavus Adolphus College, St. Peter, Minnesota, United States of America
3Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, United States of America
Presenting Author: Dahan Kim

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol. 2012 Apr 1;22(4):746–57.
2. Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, et al. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. European Urology. 2019 Sept 1;76(3):340–51.
3. Riederer SJ, Borisch EA, Froemming AT, Grimm RC, Hassanzadeh S, Kawashima A, et al. Improved image quality and reduced acquisition time in prostate T2-weighted spin-echo MRI using a modified PI-RADS-adherent sequence. European Radiology Experimental. 2025 May 24;9(1):55.
4. Wilcoxon F. Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. Biometrics Bulletin. 1945;1(6):80–3.
5. Stupic KF, Ainslie M, Boss MA, Charles C, Dienstfrey AM, Evelhoch JL, et al. A standard system phantom for magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2021;86(3):1194–211.
6. Hoang Dinh A, Souchon R, Melodelima C, Bratan F, Mège-Lechevallier F, Colombel M, et al. Characterization of prostate cancer using T2 mapping at 3 T: A multi-scanner study. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging. 2015 Apr 1;96(4):365–72.
7. Dregely I, Margolis DAJ, Sung K, Zhou Z, Rangwala N, Raman SS, et al. Rapid quantitative T2 mapping of the prostate using three-dimensional dual echo steady state MRI at 3T. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2016;76(6):1720–9.
8. van Houdt PJ, Agarwal HK, van Buuren LD, Heijmink SWTPJ, Haack S, van der Poel HG, et al. Performance of a fast and high-resolution multi-echo spin-echo sequence for prostate T2 mapping across multiple systems. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2018;79(3):1586–94.
9. Klingebiel M, Schimmöller L, Weiland E, Franiel T, Jannusch K, Kirchner J, et al. Value of T2 Mapping MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection and Classification. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2022;56(2):413–22.
10. Bernstein M, King K, Zhou X. Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2021 July 19]. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/books/handbook-of-mri-pulse-sequences/bernstein/978-0-12-092861-3

Cite this abstract