607-02-003 ISMRM Abstract

All-in-one Multiparametric T1, MPF, and QSM Mapping of the Human Brain at 3T and 7T using Deep Learning Reconstruction

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Quantitative Imaging: relaxometry, multi-parametric, MR Fingerprinting, and synthetic MRI

Secondary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Quantitative Imaging: head and neck

607-02-003 · Quantitative and Multi-Contrast MRI: Methods and Applications · Thursday, 14 May, 1:40 PM–3:30 PM · Meeting Room 1.40

Keywords: Relaxometry Quantitative MRI Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Quantitative Magnetization Transfer Quantitative synthetic MRI

Accepted

Thomas Troalen ¹, Anita Masliah^1,2,3, Hugo Dary^2,3, Thomas Yu^4,5,6, Josef Pfeuffer⁷, Patrick Liebig⁷, Maxime Guye^2,3, Guillaume Duhamel^2,3, Olivier M Girard^2,3, Lucas Soustelle^2,3

¹MR Scientific Partnership, Siemens Healthcare SAS, Courbevoie, France

²Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France

³APHM, Hôpital Universitaire Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France

⁴Swiss Innovation Hub, Siemens Healthineers International AG, Lausanne, Switzerland

⁵LTS5, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

⁶Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland

⁷MR Application Development, Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany

Presenting Author: Thomas Troalen

Synopsis

Motivation:

Goals:

Approach:

Results:

Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

References

1. Granziera C, Wuerfel J, Barkhof F, Calabrese M, De Stefano N, Enzinger C, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging towards clinical application in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2021 Jun 22;144(5):1296–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab029. [doi]

2. Stikov N, Boudreau M, Levesque IR, Tardif CL, Barral JK, Pike GB. On the accuracy of T 1 mapping: Searching for common ground: Accuracy of T 1 Mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Feb;73(2):514–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25135. [doi]

3. Assländer J. Magnetization transfer explains most of the $T_1$ variability in the MRI literature [Internet]. aarXiv:2409.05318. Preprint, arXiv 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.05318. [doi]

4. Masliah A, Soustelle L, Anderson T, Guye M, Duhamel G, Rapacchi S, et al. Accelerated high-resolution joint quantitative T1 and magnetization transfer MRI at 3T. In 2024. Paper presented at ESMRMB 2024, Barcelona, Spain. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-024-01191-6. [doi]

5. Kisel AA, Naumova AV, Yarnykh VL. Macromolecular Proton Fraction as a Myelin Biomarker: Principles, Validation, and Applications. Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 9;16:819912. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.819912. [doi]

6. Soustelle L, Troalen T, Hertanu A, Ranjeva JP, Guye M, Varma G, et al. Quantitative magnetization transfer MRI unbiased by on-resonance saturation and dipolar order contributions. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2023;90(3):875–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29678. [doi]

7. Wei H, Yoon JH, Jeon SK, Choi JW, Lee J, Kim JH, et al. Enhancing gadoxetic acid–enhanced liver MRI: a synergistic approach with deep learning CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and optimized fat suppression techniques. Eur Radiol. 2024 Mar 16;34(10):6712–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10693-9. [doi]

8. Liu Z, Patel V, Zhou X, Tao S, Yu T, Ma J, et al. Deep Learning Reconstruction for 7T MP2RAGE and SPACE MRI: Improving Image Quality at High Acceleration Factors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 May 20;ajnr;ajnr.A8841v2. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8841. [doi]

9. QSM Consensus Organization Committee, Bilgic B, Costagli M, Chan K, Duyn J, Langkammer C, et al. Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: A consensus of the ISMRM electro‐magnetic tissue properties study group. Magnetic Resonance in Med. 2024 May;91(5):1834–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30006. [doi]

10. Walsh DO, Gmitro AF, Marcellin MW. Adaptive reconstruction of phased array MR imagery. Magn Reson Med. 2000 May;43(5):682–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(200005)43:5<682::AID-MRM10>3.0.CO;2-G. [doi]

11. Inati SJ, Hansen MS, Kellman P. A Fast Optimal Method for Coil Sensitivity Estimation and Adaptive Coil Combination for Complex Images. Paper presented at ISMRM 2014, Milan, Italy. 2014.

12. Liu J, Liu T, De Rochefort L, Ledoux J, Khalidov I, Chen W, et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. NeuroImage. 2012 Feb;59(3):2560–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.082. [doi]

13. Arani A, Borowski B, Felmlee J, Reid RI, Thomas DL, Gunter JL, et al. Design and validation of the ADNI MR protocol. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2024 Sep;20(9):6615–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14162. [doi]

14. Deoni SCL, Rutt BK, Peters TM. Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state. Magnetic Resonance in Med. 2003 Mar;49(3):515–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10407. [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/607-02-003