Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
363-02-014
ISMRM Abstract
Assessing the performance of on-scanner geometric distortion correction for whole-body diffusion weighted imaging
Accepted
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
Log inReferences
1. Andersson, J. L. R., Skare, S., & Ashburner, J. (2003). How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: Application to diffusion tensor imaging. NeuroImage, 20(2), 870–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7 [doi]
2. Jezzard, P., & Balaban, R. S. (1995). Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 34(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910340111 [doi]
3. De Vuysere S, Vandecaveye V, De Bruecker Y, et al. Accuracy of whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI (WB-DWI/MRI) in diagnosis, staging and follow-up of gastric cancer, in comparison to CT: a pilot study. BMC Med Imaging. 2021;21(1):18. doi:10.1186/s12880-021-00550-2 [doi]
4. Digma LA, Feng CH, Conlin CC, et al. Correcting B0 inhomogeneity-induced distortions in whole-body diffusion MRI of bone. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):265. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-04467-2 [doi]
5. Sjöholm T, Kullberg J, Strand R, Engström M, Ahlström H, Malmberg F. Improved geometric accuracy of whole body diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T and 3T using reverse polarity gradients. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):11605. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-15872-6 [doi]
6. Müller-Horvat C, Radny P, Eigentler TK, et al. Prospective comparison of the impact on treatment decisions of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. European Journal of Cancer. 2006;42(3):342-350. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.10.008 [doi]
7. De Paepe KN, Van Keerberghen CA, Agazzi GM, et al. Quantitative Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted MRI after One Treatment Cycle for Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Is an Independent Prognostic Factor of Outcome. Radiology: Imaging Cancer. 2021;3(2):e200061. doi:10.1148/rycan.2021200061 [doi]
8. Wasserthal, J., Breit, H.-C., Meyer, M.T., Pradella, M., Hinck, D., Sauter, A.W., Heye, T., Boll, D., Cyriac, J., Yang, S., Bach, M., Segeroth, M., 2023. TotalSegmentator: Robust Segmentation of 104 Anatomic Structures in CT Images. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230024 [doi]
9. Isensee, F., Jaeger, P.F., Kohl, S.A.A. et al. nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods 18, 203–211 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z [doi]
10. Lowekamp, B. C., Chen D. T., Ibáñez L., Blezek D., “The Design of SimpleITK”, Front. Neuroinform., 7:45. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2013.00045, 2013. [doi]
11. Chlap P, Finnegan RN. PlatiPy: Processing Library and Analysis Toolkit for Medical Imaging in Python. Journal of Open Source Software. 2023;8(86):5374. doi:10.21105/joss.05374 [doi]
12. Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T.E. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 17, 261–272 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 [doi]
Cite this abstract
http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/363-02-014