Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
568-06-005 ISMRM Abstract

SNR-Guided Compressed Sensing Reconstruction for Ultra-High Field Non-Cartesian MRI

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Subsampling: Parallel imaging, compressed sensing and low-rank modeling
Secondary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Image Reconstruction: Non-AI
568-06-005 · Image Reconstruction II · Wednesday, 13 May, 4:55 PM–5:50 PM · Digital Posters Row I
Keywords: Compressed Sensing Non cartesian MRI Ultrahigh-field MRI 3D Reconstruction
Accepted
Hongyi Gu1, Hongyu Li1, Zhibo Zhu1, Jue Hou1, Zheng Zhong1, zihao zhu2, Qi Liu 1
1United Imaging Healthcare North America, Houston, United States of America
2United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China
Presenting Author: Qi Liu

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58(6):1182-1195.
2. Baron CA, Dwork N, Pauly JM, Nishimura DG. Rapid Compressed Sensing Reconstruction of 3D Non-Cartesian MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2017;79(5):2685-2692.
3. Hong T, Hernandez-Garcia L, Fessler JM. A Complex Quasi-Newton Proximal Method for Image Reconstruction in Compressed Sensing MRI. IEEE Trans Comput Imaging. 2024;10(2):372-384.
4. Virtue P, Lustig M. The Empirical Effect of Gaussian Noise in Undersampled MRI Reconstruction. Tomography. 2017;3(4):211–221.
5. Schoormans J, Strijkers GJ, Hansen AC, Nederveen AJ, Coolen BF. Compressed sensing MRI with variable density averaging (CS-VDA) outperforms full sampling at low SNR. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65(4):045004.
6. Pohmann R, Speck O, Scheffler K. Signal-to-noise ratio and MR tissue parameters in human brain imaging at 3, 7, and 9.4 Tesla using current receive coil arrays. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75(2):801-809.
7. Uğurbil K. Imaging at ultrahigh magnetic fields: History, challenges, and solutions. Neuroimage. 2017;168:7-32.
8. Candès EJ, Wakin MB, Boyd SP. Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ1 Minimization. J Fourier Anal Appl. 2008;14(5):877-905.
9. Gu H, Yaman B, Moeller S, Ellermann J, Ugurbil K, Akçakaya M. Revisiting ℓ₁-wavelet compressed-sensing MRI in the era of deep learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(33):e2201062119.
10. Fessler JA, Sutton BP. Nonuniform fast Fourier transforms using min-max interpolation. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2003;51(2):560-574.
11. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Börnert P, Boesiger P. Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space trajectories. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46(4):638-651.
12. Pipe JG, Menon P. Sampling density compensation in MRI: Rationale and an iterative numerical solution. Magn Reson Med. 1999;41(1):179–186.
13. Fessler JA. Optimization methods for magnetic resonance image reconstruction: Key models and optimization algorithms. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2020;37(1):33–40.
14. Aggarwal HK, Mani MP, Jacob M. MoDL: Model-based deep learning architecture for inverse problems. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019;38(2):394‐405.
15. Kellman P, McVeigh ER. Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54(6):1439-1447.

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/568-06-005