Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
365-04-005 ISMRM Abstract

Evaluation of Conventional MRI Sequences for Diagnosing Intrauterine Adhesions

Primary: Body - Uterus
Secondary: Analysis Methods - Visualization
365-04-005 · Body MR: Potpourri of Techniques in Uterine, Cervical, Liver, and Kidney Imaging · Monday, 11 May, 2:45 PM–3:40 PM · Digital Posters Row F
Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging Intrauterine adhesions T2-weighted imaging Diagnostic performance Noninvasive diagnosis
Accepted
Tianzhu Liu 1, Zhixuan Song2, Xiaodan Li3, Jiahui Tang1, Wanchun Zhang1, Lesheng Huang1
1Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China
2Clinical and Technical Support, Philips Healthcare (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China
3Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China
Presenting Author: Tianzhu Liu

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, Xia E, Li TC. Asherman syndrome—one century later. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):759–779. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.096 [doi]
2. Chen L, Zhang H, Wang Q, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of intrauterine adhesions: correlation with hysteroscopic findings. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49(2):500–509. doi:10.1002/jmri.26231 [doi]
3. Feng X, Chen L, Li Y, et al. Diagnostic value of MRI in intrauterine adhesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(3):1554–1564. doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06437-1 [doi]
4. Soares SR, Barbosa dos Reis MM, Camargos AF. Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingography, transvaginal sonography, and hysteroscopy in intrauterine adhesion detection. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(2):406–411. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00492-6 [doi]
5. Yu H, Gao X, Xu H, et al. MRI-based assessment of uterine cavity deformity in intrauterine adhesions: correlation with hysteroscopic classification. Eur J Radiol. 2022;151:110288. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110288 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/365-04-005