Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
431-01-011 / 431-01-011 ISMRM Abstract

Estimation of T1, PD, and T2 Maps from Weighted Images and Evaluation of Their Accuracy in Brain Tumors

Primary: Neuro - Tumors
Secondary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Quantitative Imaging: relaxometry, multi-parametric, MR Fingerprinting, and synthetic MRI
431-01-011 · From Microstructure to Metabolism: Next-Generation MRI for Brain Tumors · Tuesday, 12 May, 8:20 AM–9:56 AM · Roof Terrace
431-01-011 · From Microstructure to Metabolism: Next-Generation MRI for Brain Tumors · Tuesday, 12 May, 8:20 AM–9:56 AM · Roof Terrace
Keywords: T1 Mapping T1-weighted Imaging Quantitative synthetic MRI Bias field correction Quantitative MRI (qMRI)
Accepted
Dennis C Thomas 1,2,3,4, Seyma Alcicek1,2,3,4, Andrei Manzhurtsev1, Mariem Ghazouani1, Ralf Deichmann5, Ulrike Nöth5, Ulrich Pilatus1, Elke Hattingen1,2,3,4, Katharina J Wenger1,2,3,4
1Goethe University, University Hospital Frankfurt, Institute of Neuroradiology and Cooperative Brain Imaging Center - CoBIC, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
2Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
3German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
4University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
5Goethe University, Cooperative Brain Imaging Center (CoBIC), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Presenting Author: Dennis C Thomas

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Qiu S, Wang L, Sati P, Christodoulou AG, Xie Y, Li D. Physics-guided self-supervised learning for retrospective T and T mapping from conventional weighted brain MRI: Technical developments and initial validation in glioblastoma. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2024;92(6):2683-2695. doi:10.1002/mrm.30226 [doi]
2. Qiu S, Chen Y, Ma S, et al. Multiparametric mapping in the brain from conventional contrast-weighted images using deep learning. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2022;87(1):488-495. doi:10.1002/mrm.28962 [doi]
3. Moya-Sáez E, Peña-Nogales Ó, Luis-García R de, Alberola-López C. A deep learning approach for synthetic MRI based on two routine sequences and training with synthetic data. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2021;210:106371. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106371 [doi]
4. Mejia A, Sweeney EM, Dewey B, et al. Statistical estimation of T1 relaxation times using conventional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage. 2016;133:176-188. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.037 [doi]
5. Lavielle A, Pinaud N, Zhang B, Crémillieux Y. Quantitative brain T1 maps derived from T1-weighted MRI acquisitions: a proof-of-concept study. European Radiology Experimental. 2024;8(1):109. doi:10.1186/s41747-024-00517-2 [doi]
6. Lavielle A, Boux F, Deborne J, et al. T1 Mapping From MPRAGE Acquisitions: Application to the Measurement of the Concentration of Nanoparticles in Tumors for Theranostic Use. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2023;58(1):313-323. doi:10.1002/jmri.28509 [doi]
7. Moskovich S, Shtangel O, Mezer AA. Approximating R1 and R2: A Quantitative Approach to Clinical Weighted MRI. Human Brain Mapping. 2024;45(18):e70102. doi:10.1002/hbm.70102 [doi]
8. Hasse A, Bertini J, Foxley S, Jeong Y, Javed A, Carroll TJ. Application of a novel T1 retrospective quantification using internal references (T1-REQUIRE) algorithm to derive quantitative T1 relaxation maps of the brain. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology. 2022;32(6):1903-1915. doi:10.1002/ima.22768 [doi]
9. Young G, Nguyen VS, Howlett-Prieto Q, Abuaf AF, Carroll TJ, Javed A. Validation of retroactively derived T1 relaxation values from 3D T1-weighted images with clinical and MRI measures of disability in multiple sclerosis. PLOS ONE. 2025;20(5):e0323898. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323898 [doi]
10. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. NeuroImage. 2005;26(3):839-851. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018 [doi]
11. Nöth U, Hattingen E, Bähr O, Tichy J, Deichmann R. Improved visibility of brain tumors in synthetic MP-RAGE anatomies with pure T1 weighting. NMR in Biomedicine. 2015;28(7):818-830. doi:10.1002/nbm.3324 [doi]
12. Fatouros PP, Marmarou A, Kraft KA, Inao S, Schwarz FP. In Vivo Brain Water Determination by T1 Measurements: Effect of Total Water Content, Hydration Fraction, and Field Strength. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1991;17(2):402-413. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910170212 [doi]
13. Wansapura JP, Holland SK, Dunn RS, Ball Jr. WS. NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 1999;9(4):531-538. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199904)9:4<531::AID-JMRI4>3.0.CO;2-L [doi]
14. Thomas DC, Deichmann R, Nöth U, et al. A fast protocol for multi-center, multi-parametric quantitative MRI studies in brain tumor patients using vendor sequences. Neuro-Oncology Advances. Published online July 4, 2024:vdae117. doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdae117 [doi]
15. Kofler F, Berger C, Waldmannstetter D, et al. BraTS Toolkit: Translating BraTS Brain Tumor Segmentation Algorithms Into Clinical and Scientific Practice. Front Neurosci. 2020;14. doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00125 [doi]
16. Volz S, Nöth U, Deichmann R. Correction of systematic errors in quantitative proton density mapping. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2012;68(1):74-85. doi:10.1002/mrm.23206 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/431-01-011