Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
503-01-009 ISMRM Abstract

Enhanced Detection of Neuroplasticity After Stroke Using Multi-Band fMRI and Lesion-Centered connectivity Modeling

Accepted
Himanshu Singh 1, Sparsh Singh2, Vishnu V. Y.2, S Senthil Kumaran1, Leve Joseph Devarajan Sebastian3, Ajay Garg3
1Department of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
3Department of Neuroimaging & Interventional Neuroradiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Presenting Author: Himanshu Singh

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. 1. Cassidy, J. M. et al. Functional connectivity drives stroke recovery: Shifting the paradigm from correlation to causation. Brain 145, 1211–1228 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab469 [doi]
2. 2. Siegel, J. S. et al. Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E4367–E4376 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1521083113 [doi]
3. 3. Keilholz, S. D. et al. Noise and non-neuronal contributions to the BOLD signal: Applications to and insights from animal studies. NeuroImage 154, 267–281 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.019 [doi]
4. 4. Setsompop, K. et al. Blipped-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g-factor penalty. Magn. Reson. Med. 67, 1210–1224 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.23097 [doi]
5. 5. Feinberg, D. A. & Yacoub, E. The rapid development of high-speed, high-resolution functional MRI. NeuroImage 62, 720–725 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.049 [doi]
6. 6. Siegel, J. S. et al. The effects of hemodynamic lag on functional connectivity and behavior after stroke. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 36, 2162–2176 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X15614846 [doi]
7. 7. Thiebaut de Schotten, M., Foulon, C. & Nachev, P. Brain disconnections link structural connectivity with function and behavior. Nat. Commun. 11, 5094 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18920-9 [doi]
8. 8. Ktena, S. I. et al. Brain connectivity measures improve modelling of functional outcome after acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 50, 2761–2767 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025738 [doi]
9. 9. Wiltgen, T. et al. LST-AI: A deep learning ensemble for accurate MS lesion segmentation. medRxiv (2023). https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.23.23298966 [doi]
10. 10. Foulon, C. et al. Advanced lesion symptom mapping analyses and implementation as BCBtoolkit. GigaScience 7, 1–17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy004 [doi]
11. 11. Esteban, O. et al. fMRIPrep: A robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI. Nat. Methods 16, 111–116 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4 [doi]
12. 12. Lamouroux, A., Coloigner, J., Maurel, P., Farrugia, N. & Lioi, G. Evaluating lesion-specific preprocessing pipelines for rs-fMRI in stroke patients: Impact on functional connectivity and behavioral prediction. Imaging Neurosci. 3, IMAG.a.6 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1162/IMAG.a.6 [doi]
13. 13. Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. & Nieto-Castanon, A. Conn: A functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect. 2, 125–141 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2012.0073 [doi]

Cite this abstract