Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
460-03-015
ISMRM Abstract
Tumor Histogram Analysis of DWI and Synthetic MRI in the Preoperative Prediction of ALNM in Breast Cancer
Accepted
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
Log inReferences
1. BRAY F, LAVERSANNE M, SUNG H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3): 229-63.doi:10.3322/caac.21834. [doi]
2. GIULIANO A E, BALLMAN K V, MCCALL L, et al. Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA, 2017, 318(10): 918-26.doi:10.1001/jama.2017.11470. [doi]
3. MARINO M A, AVENDANO D, ZAPATA P, et al. Lymph Node Imaging in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer: Concurrent Diagnostic Tools.Oncologist, 2020, 25(2): e231-e42.doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0427 [doi]
4. MANN R M, CHO N, MOY L. Breast MRI: State of the Art [J]. Radiology, 2019, 292(3): 520-36.doi:10.1148/radiol.2019182947. [doi]
5. [YU Y, HE Z, OUYANG J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics predicts preoperative axillary lymph node metastasis to support surgical decisions and is associated with tumor microenvironment in invasive breast cancer: A machine learning, multicenter study.EBioMedicine, 2021, 69: 103460.doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103460. [doi]
6. Zhou P, Wei Y, Chen G, et al. Axillary lymph node metastasis detection by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with breast cancer: A meta-analysis.Thorac Cancer. 2018;9(8):989-996. doi:10.1111/1759-7714.12774. [doi]
7. Gonçalves FG, Serai SD, Zuccoli G. Synthetic Brain MRI: Review of Current Concepts andFutureDirections.TopMagnResonImaging.2018;27(6):387-393.doi:10.1097/RMR.0000000000000189. [doi]
8. YANG X, LU Z, TAN X, et al. Evaluating the added va.lue of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in predicting sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2024, 14(6): 3789-802.doi:10.21037/qims-24-1. [doi]
9. Qu M, Feng W, Liu X, et al. Investigation of synthetic MRI with quantitative parameters for discriminating axillary lymph nodes status in invasive breast cancer.Eur J Radiol. 2024;175:111452.doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111452. [doi]
10. Gourtsoyianni S, Doumou G, Prezzi D,et al. Primary rectal cancer: repeatability of global and local-regional MR imaging texture features. Radiology 2017;284:552-61.doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161375. [doi]
11. XU Z, DING Y, ZHAO K, et al. MRI characteristics of breast edema for assessing axillary lymph node burden in early-stage breast cancer: a retrospective bicentric study Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(12): 8213-25.doi:10.1007/s00330-022-08896-z [doi]
12. Li L,Xu Y,Lai Z,et al.Development and validation of a model and nomogram for breast cancer diagnosis based on quantitative analysis of serum disease-specific haptoglobin N-glycosylation.Transl Med,2024,22(1):331.doi:10.1186/s12967-024-05039-4. [doi]
13. Kim JY, Kim JJ, Hwangbo L, et al. Diffusion-weighted Imaging of Invasive Breast Cancer: Relationship to Distant Metastasis-free Survival.Radiology. 2019;291(2):300-307.doi:10.1148/radiol.2019181706 [doi]
Cite this abstract
http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/460-03-015