Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
564-06-003 ISMRM Abstract

UltimateSynth Deep-brain Net (UDN): Deep Brain Segmentation of Any MRI Contrast and Age via Physics-Informed Deep Learning

Primary: Analysis Methods - Segmentation and Detection
Secondary: Analysis Methods - Image Synthesis and Translation
564-06-003 · Segmentation for Neuro Applications · Wednesday, 13 May, 4:55 PM–5:50 PM · Digital Posters Row E
Keywords: Segmentation Lifespan Contrast-agnostic Image synthesis Deep Brain
Accepted
Rhea Adams1,2, Khoi M Huynh3,4, Walter Zhao5, Zhicheng Wu2, Eunate Alzaga Goñi 2, Hengji Chen2, Angela Noecker2, Andreas Seas6, Benjamin Succop Jr6, Stephen Harward II6, Cameron McIntyre2, Pew-Thian Yap3,4, Dan Ma2,6
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States of America
2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, United States of America
3Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States of America
4Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States of America
5Medical Scientist Training Program, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, United States of America
6Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States of America
Presenting Author: Eunate Alzaga Goñi

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. De Jong, L. W. et al. Strongly reduced volumes of putamen and thalamus in Alzheimer’s disease: an MRI study. Brain 131, 3277–3285 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn278 [doi]
2. Braak, H. & Braak, E. Alzheimer’s disease affects limbic nuclei of the thalamus. Acta Neuropathol. (Berl.) 81, 261–268 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305867 [doi]
3. Mostofi, A., Morgante, F., Edwards, M. J., Brown, P. & Pereira, E. A. C. Pain in Parkinson’s disease and the role of the subthalamic nucleus. Brain 144, 1342–1350 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab001 [doi]
4. Trufanov, A. et al. Thalamic nuclei degeneration in multiple sclerosis. J. Clin. Neurosci. 89, 375–380 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2021.05.043 [doi]
5. Limousin-Dowsey, P. et al. Thalamic, subthalamic nucleus and internal pallidum stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. 246, II42–II45 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161080 [doi]
6. Federau, C. et al. Transcranial MRI‐guided high‐intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of essential tremor: A pilot study on the correlation between lesion size, lesion location, thermal dose, and clinical outcome. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 48, 58–65 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25878 [doi]
7. Segobin, S. et al. A roadmap towards standardized neuroimaging approaches for human thalamic nuclei. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 792–808 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-024-00867-1 [doi]
8. Tourdias, T., Saranathan, M., Levesque, I. R., Su, J. & Rutt, B. K. Visualization of intra-thalamic nuclei with optimized white-matter-nulled MPRAGE at 7T. NeuroImage 84, 534–545 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.069 [doi]
9. Vassal, F. et al. Direct stereotactic targeting of the ventrointermediate nucleus of the thalamus based on anatomic 1.5-T MRI mapping with a white matter attenuated inversion recovery (WAIR) sequence. Brain Stimulat. 5, 625–633 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.10.007 [doi]
10. Sudhyadhom, A., Haq, I. U., Foote, K. D., Okun, M. S. & Bova, F. J. A high resolution and high contrast MRI for differentiation of subcortical structures for DBS targeting: The Fast Gray Matter Acquisition T1 Inversion Recovery (FGATIR). NeuroImage 47, T44–T52 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.018 [doi]
11. Ma, D. et al. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature 495, 187–192 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11971 [doi]
12. Adams, R. et al. UltimateSynth: MRI Physics for Pan-Contrast AI. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.05.627056 (2024). [doi]
13. Ma, D. et al. Development of high‐resolution 3D MR fingerprinting for detection and characterization of epileptic lesions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 49, 1333–1346 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26319 [doi]
14. Su, J. H. et al. Thalamus Optimized Multi Atlas Segmentation (THOMAS): fast, fully automated segmentation of thalamic nuclei from structural MRI. NeuroImage 194, 272–282 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.021 [doi]
15. Pauli, W. M., Nili, A. N. & Tyszka, J. M. A high-resolution probabilistic in vivo atlas of human subcortical brain nuclei. Sci. Data 5, 180063 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.63 [doi]
16. Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A. A., Petersen, J. & Maier-Hein, K. H. nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat. Methods 18, 203–211 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z [doi]
17. Vidal, J. P. et al. Robust thalamic nuclei segmentation from T1-weighted MRI using polynomial intensity transformation. Brain Struct. Funct. 229, 1087–1101 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-024-02777-5 [doi]
18. Tregidgo, H. F. J. et al. Accurate Bayesian segmentation of thalamic nuclei using diffusion MRI and an improved histological atlas. NeuroImage 274, 120129 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120129 [doi]
19. Iglesias, J. E. et al. A probabilistic atlas of the human thalamic nuclei combining ex vivo MRI and histology. NeuroImage 183, 314–326 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.012 [doi]
20. Van Essen, D. C. et al. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview. NeuroImage 80, 62–79 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041 [doi]
21. Harms, M. P. et al. Extending the Human Connectome Project across ages: Imaging protocols for the Lifespan Development and Aging projects. NeuroImage 183, 972–984 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.060 [doi]
22. Alexander, L. M. et al. An open resource for transdiagnostic research in pediatric mental health and learning disorders. Sci. Data 4, 170181 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.181 [doi]
23. Howell, B. R. et al. The UNC/UMN Baby Connectome Project (BCP): An overview of the study design and protocol development. NeuroImage 185, 891–905 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.049 [doi]
24. Williams, B., Nguyen, D., Vidal, J. P. & Saranathan, M. Thalamic nuclei segmentation from T1-weighted MRI: Unifying and benchmarking state-of-the-art methods. Imaging Neurosci. 2, 1–16 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00166 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/564-06-003