Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
569-05-013 ISMRM Abstract

Generalization analysis of low-rank regularized fine-tuning-based deep learning for magnetic resonance spectroscopy denoising

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging
Secondary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Image Reconstruction: AI
569-05-013 · Spectroscopy and Spectroscopic Imaging: Methods · Wednesday, 13 May, 4:00 PM–4:55 PM · Digital Posters Row J
Keywords: NMR spectroscopy Spectral denoising Fine-tuning learning Low-rank regularization Deep neural networks
Accepted
Jian Cao1, Tianyu Qiu2, Di Guo2, Zhangren Tu1, Yihui Huang1, Chunyan Xiong3, xianwang jiang4, Xiaobo Qu 1
1Department of Electronic Science, Xiamen University-Neusoft Medical Magnetic Resonance Imaging Joint Research and Development Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
2School of Computer and Information Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, China
3Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
4Shanghai Neusoft Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
Presenting Author: Xiaobo Qu

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. H. Nguyen et al., “Denoising MR spectroscopic imaging data with low-rank approximations,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 78-89, 2012.
2. X. Qu et al., “Accelerated NMR spectroscopy with low-rank reconstruction,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 852-854, 2015.
3. D. Guo et al., “Review and prospect: Applications of exponential signals with machine learning in nuclear magnetic resonance, Spectroscopy,” vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 22-32, 2023.
4. Q. Yang et al., “Physics-driven synthetic data learning for biomedical magnetic resonance: The imaging physics-based data synthesis paradigm for artificial intelligence,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 40, no.2, pp. 129-140, 2023.
5. T. Qiu et al., “Review and prospect: NMR spectroscopy denoising & reconstruction with low rank Hankel matrices and tensors,” Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, vol. 59, no.3, pp.324-345, 2021.
6. X. Qu et al., “Accelerated nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with deep learning,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 59, no. 26, pp. 10297-10300, 2020.
7. Y. Huang, J. Zhao, Z. Wang, V. Orekhov, D. Guo, and X. Qu, “Exponential signal reconstruction with deep Hankel matrix factorization,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 6214–6226, 2023.
8. J. Ying, J.-F. Cai, D. Guo, G. Tang, Z. Chen, and X. Qu, “Vandermonde factorization of Hankel matrix for complex exponential signal recovery—Application in fast NMR spectroscopy,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 21, pp. 5520–5533, 2018.
9. D. Guo et al., “XCloud-VIP: Virtual peak enables highly accelerated NMR spectroscopy and faithful quantitative measures,” IEEE Trans. Comput. Imag., vol. 9, pp. 1043–1057, 2023.
10. Y. Huang et al., “Scalable deep learning reconstruction for accelerated multidimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins，” Sci. Adv., Vol. 11, no. 39, eadw8122, 2025.
11. S.-B. Lin, “Generalization and expressivity for deep nets,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1392–1406, 2019.
12. H. N. Mhaskar and T. Poggio, “An analysis of training and generalization errors in shallow and deep networks,” Neural Netw., vol. 121, pp. 229–241, 2020.
13. B. Neyshabur, R. Tomioka, and N. Srebro, “In search of the real inductive bias: On the role of implicit regularization in deep learning,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR) Workshop, 2015, pp. 1–9.
14. M. Even, S. Pesme, S. Gunasekar, and N. Flammarion, “(S)GD over diagonal linear networks: Implicit bias, large stepsizes and edge of stability,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), vol. 36, 2023, pp. 1–43.
15. J. Cao, C. Qian, Y. Huang, et al, “A dynamics theory of RMSProp-based implicit regularization in deep low-rank matrix factorization,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., Vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 18750-18764, 2025.
16. Z. Wang, N. Ding, T. Levinboim, et al, “Improving robust generalization by direct pac-bayesian bound minimization,” in Proc. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2023, pp. 16458-16468.
17. H. Ju, D. Li, H.R. Zhang, “Robust fine-tuning of deep neural networks with hessian-based generalization guarantees,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML), 2022, pp. 10431-10461.
18. D. Li, H. Zhang, “Improved regularization and robustness for fine-tuning in neural networks,” in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), vol. 34, 2021, pp. 27249-27262.
19. S. Arora, R. Ge, B. Neyshabur, et al, “Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approach,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML), 2018, pp. 254-263.
20. G. Henry, M.H. Timothy, P. Massimiliano, “Distance-based regularisation of deep networks for fine-tuning,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), 2021, pp.1-20.

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/569-05-013