Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition
9 May 2026 – 14 May 2026 · Cape Town, South Africa
505-03-006 ISMRM Abstract

Altered Thalamic Soma and Neurite Microstructure in Migraine with Aura on High-Gradient Diffusion MRI

Primary: Neuro - Gray Matter
Secondary: Diffusion - Microstructure
505-03-006 · Teasing Out the Microstructure of the Brain and Nervous System · Wednesday, 13 May, 1:40 PM–3:30 PM · Ballroom West
Keywords: Gray Matter Microstructure Diffusion-weighted MRI Thalamus Migraine with Aura
Accepted
Laleh Eskandarian 1, Kyla Gaudet1, Hansol Lee1, Eva A Krijnen2,3, Yixin Ma1, Hong Hsi Lee1, Katharina Eikermann-Haerter4, Susie Huang1,5
1Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, United States of America
2Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
3MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
4Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, United States of America
5Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
Presenting Author: Laleh Eskandarian

Synopsis

Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

Log in

References

1. Stovner, LJ et al. The Global Burden of Headache: A Documentation of Headache Prevalence and Disability Worldwide. Cephalalgia 27, 193–210 (2007). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01288.x. [doi]
2. Viana, Michele et al. Clinical features of migraine aura: Results from a prospective diary-aided study. Cephalalgia 37, 979–989 (2016). doi: 10.1177/0333102416657147. [doi]
3. Younis, Samaira, Hougaard, Anders, Noseda, Rodrigo & Ashina, Messoud. Current understanding of thalamic structure and function in migraine. Cephalalgia 39, 1675–1682 (2018). doi: 10.1177/0333102418791595. [doi]
4. Magon, S. et al. Morphological Abnormalities of Thalamic Subnuclei in Migraine: A Multicenter MRI Study at 3 Tesla. The Journal of Neuroscience 35, 13800 (2015). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2154-15.2015. [doi]
5. Yang, Y. et al. Functional connectivity and structural changes of thalamic subregions in episodic migraine. J Headache Pain 23, 119 (2022). doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01491-z. [doi]
6. Coppola, G. et al. Thalamo-cortical network activity between migraine attacks: Insights from MRI-based microstructural and functional resting-state network correlation analysis. J Headache Pain 17, 100 (2016). doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0693-y. doi: 10.1177/03331024221128278. [doi]
7. Schramm, Severin et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in migraine: A systematic review. Cephalalgia 43, 03331024221128278 (2023). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2021.100130. [doi]
8. Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, J. J. et al. The structural and functional importance of the thalamus in migraine processes with and without aura. A literature review. Translational Research in Anatomy 24, 100130 (2021). doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1063-3. [doi]
9. Shin, K. J., Lee, H.-J. & Park, K. M. Alterations of individual thalamic nuclei volumes in patients with migraine. J Headache Pain 20, 112 (2019). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.078. [doi]
10. Setsompop, K. et al. Pushing the limits of in vivo diffusion MRI for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 80, 220–233 (2013). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.078. [doi]
11. Huang, S. Y. et al. Connectome 2.0: Developing the next-generation ultra-high gradient strength human MRI scanner for bridging studies of the micro-, meso- and macro-connectome. Neuroimage 243, 118530 (2021). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118530. [doi]
12. Ramos-Llordén, G. et al. Ultra-high gradient connectomics and microstructure MRI scanner for imaging of human brain circuits across scales. Nat Biomed Eng https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-025-01457-x (2025) doi:10.1038/s41551-025-01457-x. doi: 10.1038/s41551-025-01457-x. [doi]
13. Feinberg, D. A. et al. Next-generation MRI scanner designed for ultra-high-resolution human brain imaging at 7 Tesla. Nat Methods 20, 2048–2057 (2023). doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-02068-7. [doi]
14. Foo, T. K. F. et al. Highly efficient head-only magnetic field insert gradient coil for achieving simultaneous high gradient amplitude and slew rate at 3.0T (MAGNUS) for brain microstructure imaging. Magn Reson Med 83, 2356–2369 (2020). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28087. [doi]
15. Basser, P. J., Mattiello, J. & LeBihan, D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J 66, 259–267 (1994). doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80775-1 [doi]
16. Jensen, J. H., Helpern, J. A., Ramani, A., Lu, H. & Kaczynski, K. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: The quantification of non‐gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 53, 1432–1440 (2005). doi: 10.1002/mrm.20508. [doi]
17. Lee, H. et al. Age-related alterations in human cortical microstructure across the lifespan: Insights from high-gradient diffusion MRI. Aging Cell 23, e14267 (2024). doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.14267. [doi]
18. Huang, S. et al. Visualizing cortical laminar architecture in the living human brain using next-generation ultra-high-gradient diffusion MRI. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6724971/v1 (2025). doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6724971/v1. [doi]
19. Palombo, M. et al. SANDI: A compartment-based model for non-invasive apparent soma and neurite imaging by diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 215, 116835 (2020). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116835. [doi]
20. Keil, B. et al. A 64-channel 3T array coil for accelerated brain MRI. Magn Reson Med 70, 248–258 (2013). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24427. [doi]
21. Tian, Q. et al. Comprehensive diffusion MRI dataset for in vivo human brain microstructure mapping using 300 mT/m gradients. Sci Data 9, 7 (2022). doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-01092-6. [doi]
22. Huang, S. Y. et al. High-gradient diffusion MRI reveals distinct estimates of axon diameter index within different white matter tracts in the in vivo human brain. Brain Struct Funct 225, 1277–1291 (2020).doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-01961-2. [doi]
23. Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62, 774–781 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021. [doi]
24. Fan, L. et al. The Human Brainnetome Atlas: A New Brain Atlas Based on Connectional Architecture. Cerebral Cortex 26, 3508–3526 (2016). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw157. [doi]
25. Tregidgo, H. F. J. et al. Domain-Agnostic Segmentation of Thalamic Nuclei from Joint Structural and Diffusion MRI. in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2023 (eds. Greenspan, H. et al.) 247–257 (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2023).
26. Tregidgo, H. F. J. et al. Accurate Bayesian segmentation of thalamic nuclei using diffusion MRI and an improved histological atlas. Neuroimage 274, 120129 (2023). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120129. [doi]
27. Woolrich, M. W. et al. Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. Neuroimage 45, S173–S186 (2009). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.055. [doi]
28. Dale, A. M., Fischl, B. & Sereno, M. I. Cortical Surface-Based Analysis: I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction. Neuroimage 9, 179–194 (1999). doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1998.0395. [doi]
29. Greve, D. N. & Fischl, B. Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. Neuroimage 48, 63–72 (2009). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.060. [doi]
30. Fan, Q. et al. MGH–USC Human Connectome Project datasets with ultra-high b-value diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 124, 1108–1114 (2016). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.075. [doi]
31. Jovicich, J. et al. Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: Effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data. Neuroimage 30, 436–443 (2006). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.046. [doi]
32. Andersson, J. L. R. & Sotiropoulos, S. N. An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage 125, 1063–1078 (2016). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.019. [doi]
33. Noseda, R. & Burstein, R. Migraine pathophysiology: Anatomy of the trigeminovascular pathway and associated neurological symptoms, cortical spreading depression, sensitization, and modulation of pain. Pain 154, (2013).
34. Eikermann-Haerter, K. & Ayata, C. Cortical Spreading Depression and Migraine. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 10, 167–173 (2010). doi: 10.1007/s11910-010-0099-1. [doi]
35. Pietrobon, D. & Moskowitz, M. A. Pathophysiology of Migraine. Annu Rev Physiol 75, 365–391 (2013). doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183717. [doi]
36. Granziera, C. et al. Structural abnormalities in the thalamus of migraineurs with aura: A multiparametric study at 3 T. Hum Brain Mapp 35, 1461–1468 (2014). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22266. [doi]
37. Schmitz, N. et al. Attack Frequency and Disease Duration as Indicators for Brain Damage in Migraine. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain 48, 1044–1055 (2008). doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01133.x. [doi]
38. Gaist, D. et al. Migraine with visual aura associated with thicker visual cortex. Brain 141, 776–785 (2018). doi: 10.1093/brain/awx382. [doi]
39. Li, M., Eskandarian, L., Huang, S. & Eikermann-Haerter, K. Neuronal Microstructure and Glymphatic System Integrity in Migraine Patients Assessed with High-gradient Diffusion MRI (S20.005). Neurology 102, 7113 (2024). doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000208295. [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/505-03-006