660-04-005 ISMRM Abstract

Motion-Consistent Forward-Distortion Network for Deep Motion-Aware Susceptibility Artifact Correction in EPI

Primary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - AI methods

Secondary: Acquisition & Reconstruction - Artifacts and Correction Strategies

660-04-005 · AI: Anything Synthetic or Correcting Artifacts · Thursday, 14 May, 2:35 PM–3:30 PM · Digital Posters Row A

Keywords: Distortion correction Physics-driven Deep Learning Acceleration Unsupervised learning Echo-planar imaging

Accepted

Muhammed Hasan Kayapinar ^1,2, Abdallah Zaid Alkilani^1,2, M. Okan Irfanoglu, Emine Ulku Saritas^1,2

¹Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey

²National Magnetic Resonance Research Center (UMRAM), Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey

Presenting Author: Muhammed Hasan Kayapinar

Synopsis

Motivation:

Goals:

Approach:

Results:

Full abstract & presentation

The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.

Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.

To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.

References

1. Mansfield P. Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics. 1977;10. doi:10.1088/0022-3719/10/3/004 [doi]

2. Holdsworth SJ, Bammer R. Magnetic resonance imaging techniques: fMRI, DWI, and PWI. Semin Neurol. 2008;28(4):395-406. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1083697 [doi]

3. Lüdeke KM, Röschmann P, Tischler R. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 1985;3(4):329-343. doi:10.1016/0730-725x(85)90397-2 [doi]

4. Andersson JLR, Skare S, Ashburner J. How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage. 2003;20(2):870-888. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7 [doi]

5. Irfanoglu MO, Modi P, Nayak A, Hutchinson EB, Sarlls J, Pierpaoli C. DR-BUDDI (Diffeomorphic Registration for Blip-Up blip-Down Diffusion Imaging) method for correcting echo planar imaging distortions. Neuroimage. 2015;106:284-299. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.042 [doi]

6. Zahneisen B, Baeumler K, Zaharchuk G, Fleischmann D, Zeineh M. Deep flow-net for EPI distortion estimation. Neuroimage. 2020;217(116886):116886. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116886 [doi]

7. Duong STM, Phung SL, Bouzerdoum A, Schira MM. An unsupervised deep learning technique for susceptibility artifact correction in reversed phase-encoding EPI images. Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;71:1-10. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2020.04.004 [doi]

8. Zaid Alkilani A, Çukur T, Saritas EU. FD-Net: An unsupervised deep forward-distortion model for susceptibility artifact correction in EPI. Magn Reson Med. 2024;91(1):280-296. doi:10.1002/mrm.29851 [doi]

9. Abreu R, Duarte JV. Quantitative assessment of the impact of geometric distortions and their correction on fMRI data analyses. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:642808. doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.642808 [doi]

10. Jaderberg M, Simonyan K, Zisserman A, Kavukcuoglu K. Spatial Transformer Networks. arXiv [csCV]. Published online 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02025

11. Chen X, He K. Exploring simple Siamese representation learning. Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. Published online 2020:15745-15753. doi:10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01549 [doi]

12. Van Essen DC, Smith SM, Barch DM, et al. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. Neuroimage. 2013;80:62-79. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041 [doi]

13. Irfanoglu MO, Sadeghi N, Sarlls J, Pierpaoli C. Improved reproducibility of diffusion MRI of the human brain with a four-way blip-up and down phase-encoding acquisition approach. Magn Reson Med. 2021;85(5):2696-2708. doi:10.1002/mrm.28624 [doi]

Cite this abstract

http://echo.ismrm.org/p/ISMRM2026/660-04-005