Simon Blömer 1,2, Rüdiger Stirnberg1, Philipp Ehses1, Marten Veldmann1, Tony Stoecker1,2
1MR Physics, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE e.V.), Bonn, Germany
2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
Presenting Author: Simon Blömer
Synopsis
Motivation:
Goals:
Approach:
Results:
Full abstract & presentation
The full text, figures, and any recorded presentation for this abstract are not shown here. Log in if you are a member or registered attendee with access.
Full abstracts, figures, and presentations for Cape Town - 2026 ISMRM-ISMRT Annual Meeting and Exhibition are available to registered attendees. This content becomes freely available to the public roughly two years after the meeting.
To request or purchase access, contact the ISMRM Central Office at info@ismrm.org.
1. Bissell MM, Raimondi F, Ait Ali L, et al. 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2023;25(1):40. doi:10.1186/s12968-023-00942-z [doi]
2. Westenberg JJM, Van Assen HC, Van Den Boogaard PJ, et al. Echo planar imaging–induced errors in intracardiac 4D flow MRI quantification. Magnetic Resonance in Med. 2022;87(5):2398-2411. doi:10.1002/mrm.29112 [doi]
3. Duerk JL, Simonetti OP. Theoretical aspects of motion sensitivity and compensation in echo‐planar imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 1991;1(6):643-650. doi:10.1002/jmri.1880010605 [doi]
4. Butts K, Riederer SJ. Analysis of flow effects in echo‐planar imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 1992;2(3):285-293. doi:10.1002/jmri.1880020306 [doi]
5. Nishimura DG, Irarrazabal P, Meyer CH. A Velocity k ‐Space Analysis of Flow Effects in Echo‐Planar and Spiral Imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Med. 1995;33(4):549-556. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910330414 [doi]
6. Dillinger H, Walheim J, Kozerke S. On the limitations of echo planar 4D flow MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Med. 2020;84(4):1806-1816. doi:10.1002/mrm.28236 [doi]
7. Blömer S, Stirnberg R, Stöcker T. Inherent velocity encoding in EPI-based phase contrast MRI using a modified flyback approach. In: Proceedings of the 2025 ISMRM & SMRT Annual Meeting & Exhibition. 2025.
8. Park S, Beckett A, Häkkinen S, et al. Higher Spatial Resolution and Sensitivity in Whole Brain Functional MRI at 7T Using 3D EPI Accelerated with Variable Density CAIPI Sampling and Temporal Random Walk. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2025;94(2):678-693. doi:10.1002/mrm.30512 [doi]
9. Hendriks AD, D’Agata F, Raimondo L, et al. Pushing functional MRI spatial and temporal resolution further: High-density receive arrays combined with shot-selective 2D CAIPIRINHA for 3D echo-planar imaging at 7 T. NMR in Biomedicine. 2020;33(5):e4281. doi:10.1002/nbm.4281 [doi]
10. Blumenthal M, Heide M, Holme C, et al. Mrirecon/Bart: Version 0.9.00. Published online December 2023. doi:10.5281/ZENODO.10277939 [doi]
11. Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy MJ, et al. ESPIRiT — An Eigenvalue Approach to Autocalibrating Parallel MRI: Where SENSE Meets GRAPPA. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2014;71(3):990-1001. doi:10.1002/mrm.24751 [doi]
12. Huber L (Renzo), Stirnberg R, Morgan AT, et al. Short‐term gradient imperfections in high‐resolution EPI lead to Fuzzy Ripple artifacts. Magnetic Resonance in Med. 2025;94(2):571-587. doi:10.1002/mrm.30489 [doi]